Since you came over to my substack to advertise this article, here is my feedback:
The publication is not a scientific study, or even a study! It's just an article about you and your ideas. And the image shown on page 1 is literally artwork and is even labelled as such!
"Virion being produced by a nucleus cell then lysis of the cell
wall to allow the viral particles to enter into the rest of the
body, artwork by Jeff Green"
A non-living enzymatic cellular solvent produced by living cells to dissolve specific toxicity is not a "virus". You are creating confusion by using that word. I wonder why you would want to do that.
And, you and everyone else have been challenged and failed to show that the alleged "SARS-COV-2" particle even exists. The alleged "genome" has never even been found intact anywhere. The "spike protein" has never been found in anyone.
"HIV" has never been shown to exist. Stating that "Duesberg does not dispute the existence of HIV" is not the way to show "it" does exist, and only serves to add to the confusion.
"One can both “believe in viruses” and radically reject their guilt. To be tenable, this halfway position, however, requires that the true function of the false culprit be clarified." No one I know is interested in "beliefs". We're looking for claims to be backed up with valid scientific evidence.
"For him, the formal absence of isolation in no way proves that viruses are a fiction." Someone is seriously confused because there is no need for anyone to prove that viruses don't exist. The onus is on those who say they do exist to back up their claims.
"a virus cannot be [totally] isolated from the bodily fluids of its host but is nevertheless a specific entity" - This is reification fallacy - assigning properties to something never shown to exist.
"Whether they exist or not, viruses are not the cause of illnesses attributed to them! The question of their existence is secondary since they are in any case devoid of pathogenicity. Like other micro-organisms, they are not there to harm humans and are, more, the reflections of its ground. Despite their differences, natural medicine players can agree on the fact that viral particles have no causal role in the onset of so-called infectious diseases."
If something doesn't exist, obviously it doesn't cause disease and doesn't do anything.
Everything you extol is your belief. You simply believe something doesn't exist, even in the face of all available evidence, you believe otherwise. You have no logical rebuttal other than to claim this or that doesn't exist, with zero alternative provided. You have already written in one of your previous posts something like "...I had it all figured out within a few months..." But in reality, you know hardly anything about that which you speak and have displayed as much. You pretend to understand specific things when you really do not. For instance, you admit that you do not know how proteins are created by cells (like you appeared to admit to Dan Wilson).
As far as I am concerned, your motives are crystal clear. You are not interested in truth, and that is fully fleshed out in your comments to me and others. You and your crew are not interested in an actual conversation because you cannot debate the science, since you're not even in the arena. Since you cannot debate the actual science, you lash out like children and throw tantrums.
"This is reification fallacy - assigning properties to something never shown to exist."
You still do not understand, after it being explained to you multiple times, that viruses have been purified from living organisms, but cannot be 100% purified from their host fluids. That doesn't come close to meaning it doesn't exist. That is not reification fallacy.
100% wrong, and you know it. Why go out of your way to mislead people like this? What is your goal? All you have are personal insults?
No one needs to know how proteins are allegedly made in order to see the stupidity of virology.
"viruses have been purified from living organisms, but cannot be 100% purified from their host fluids" - make up your mind, have "viruses" been purified from hosts or not? If you claim yes, back up your claim with actual studies that show purification and something meeting the definition (the actual definition, not your made-up definition).
I've read the methods used in many virology papers (all of them ridiculous) and used freedom of information requests to extensively investigate whether any alleged "viruses" have actually been found in "hosts" and purified so that they could be studied scientifically. Literally hundreds of responses on dozens of "viruses" and nothing.
And numerous FOIs and emails with virologists have also shown that they don't even bother with half-assed attempts to implement controls. Controls are foundational to the scientific method. There is simply no "virus" science, period. It's a psuedoscience, by definition.
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (212 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
Hi Jeff, bought your book but haven’t gotten through much of it yet. I have some questions I’m hoping you or your followers might answer to help me get a better grasp of terrain theory.
- I’m as anti-vax as they come. No Covid jabs, never a flu shot. But… Chicken Pox. When I was a child everyone got it. Now? Almost unheard of. My four kids, youngest just turned 18, all were forced to get 2 chicken pox vaccines in order to attend school. No chicken pox, so the chicken pox vaccine at least appears to prevent chicken pox. How? If germ theory is false I would expect all vaccines, without exception, to be entirely useless. If chicken pox results from a child’s cells producing the varicella virus to assist in detoxifying, how could injecting a laboratory attenuated varicella virus into the arm do anything at all?
- What does terrain theory have to say about chronic illness? I’m referring to auto-immune disorders, post-viral syndromes, CFS/ME, chronic Lyme, etc. These are all poorly understood, with very little in the way of consensus over what causes them, or how to treat them. I researched the issue extensively years ago (before I’d ever heard of terrain theory), and found the most compelling explanation to be that most chronic illness is caused by systemic chronic retrovirus infection. In response to this infection, the immune system produces antibodies that have the unfortunate consequence of binding with various receptors and/or neurotransmitters that the nervous system relies upon to properly manage things like heart rate, blood pressure, vasoconstriction, inter-cranial pressure, digestion, etc. This then leads to a cascade of auto-immune symptoms like fatigue, exercise intolerance, tachycardia, brain fog, headaches, joint pain, digestive issues. Why is it that most college kids that come down with mononucleosis (Germ Theory claims caused by EVB infection) recover in a week or two, but some kids develop POTS and can barely climb a flight of stairs for 6 months?
- How about gluten? It is well established that people with chronic illness commonly feel better if they stop eating gluten. The germ theory explanation that I’ve seen is that retroviruses love gluten proteins, and when they encounter them in the bloodstream, they replicate, preventing the immune system from ever getting the upper hand in combatting the infection. Eliminate gluten, starve your viruses, viral loads decrease, auto-immune symptoms mitigate. What is the terrain theory explanation?
Well, thanks for the comment. Retroviruses do not live off of anything because they are not alive. So, that it is biologically impossible for them to rely on gluten. Cells can be disturbed by gluten intolerances, but mainly those severe intolerances have been built up by consuming cooked food throughout one's life that produce mutations in cells. Viruses are merely the result of something else—not the cause.
You have asked a broad question so I will give a broad answer, in regard to chronic illness. Chronic illnesses are caused by many factors. They are caused by malnutrition, accumulation of toxicity which continually irritates cells and thereby causing inflammation, as well as from environmental pollution, chemical preservatives in food, and so on.
Regarding vaccines:
Vaccines work in one sense because they can cause the body to halt current detoxification and shift its energy into removing vaccine toxicity. The body cannot do everything at once, so it must shift resources. Therefore, detoxifications can potentially be halted temporarily. This is determinantal in the long-term for the body because it is preventing the necessary detoxification and development of the body. I have covered this topic at length in the past, so do continue to explore my work further.
Thanks for responding. I've downloaded and read everything you've written including The Age of Deception. I forgot about that. I was thinking about publishing on Amazon. You would expose your book to a wider audience. Or have you tried and been blocked.
The gram negative and positive bacterium are both part of various healing and digestion processes in the body. What is claimed as negative are natural parts of the body's ecosystem. And many of those labeled negative are essential in regulation of biological functions, such as consumption of degenerative tissue. Gram negatives like E. coli feed the brain and nervous system by consuming food particulate in the large intestine, breaking it down, and excreting it into even finer particulate to deliver to brain cells, for example.
Viruses and bacteria work together in the body to regulate toxic matter, in part, and are major parts of the detoxification system. They have no direct relation per se, except that they coexist and work alongside the body.
Great article. Congratulations on getting your work out there
Brilliant!
Well done Jeff. Glad to see you're getting the recognition you rightly deserve.
Since you came over to my substack to advertise this article, here is my feedback:
The publication is not a scientific study, or even a study! It's just an article about you and your ideas. And the image shown on page 1 is literally artwork and is even labelled as such!
"Virion being produced by a nucleus cell then lysis of the cell
wall to allow the viral particles to enter into the rest of the
body, artwork by Jeff Green"
A non-living enzymatic cellular solvent produced by living cells to dissolve specific toxicity is not a "virus". You are creating confusion by using that word. I wonder why you would want to do that.
And, you and everyone else have been challenged and failed to show that the alleged "SARS-COV-2" particle even exists. The alleged "genome" has never even been found intact anywhere. The "spike protein" has never been found in anyone.
"HIV" has never been shown to exist. Stating that "Duesberg does not dispute the existence of HIV" is not the way to show "it" does exist, and only serves to add to the confusion.
"One can both “believe in viruses” and radically reject their guilt. To be tenable, this halfway position, however, requires that the true function of the false culprit be clarified." No one I know is interested in "beliefs". We're looking for claims to be backed up with valid scientific evidence.
"For him, the formal absence of isolation in no way proves that viruses are a fiction." Someone is seriously confused because there is no need for anyone to prove that viruses don't exist. The onus is on those who say they do exist to back up their claims.
"a virus cannot be [totally] isolated from the bodily fluids of its host but is nevertheless a specific entity" - This is reification fallacy - assigning properties to something never shown to exist.
"Whether they exist or not, viruses are not the cause of illnesses attributed to them! The question of their existence is secondary since they are in any case devoid of pathogenicity. Like other micro-organisms, they are not there to harm humans and are, more, the reflections of its ground. Despite their differences, natural medicine players can agree on the fact that viral particles have no causal role in the onset of so-called infectious diseases."
If something doesn't exist, obviously it doesn't cause disease and doesn't do anything.
Everything you extol is your belief. You simply believe something doesn't exist, even in the face of all available evidence, you believe otherwise. You have no logical rebuttal other than to claim this or that doesn't exist, with zero alternative provided. You have already written in one of your previous posts something like "...I had it all figured out within a few months..." But in reality, you know hardly anything about that which you speak and have displayed as much. You pretend to understand specific things when you really do not. For instance, you admit that you do not know how proteins are created by cells (like you appeared to admit to Dan Wilson).
As far as I am concerned, your motives are crystal clear. You are not interested in truth, and that is fully fleshed out in your comments to me and others. You and your crew are not interested in an actual conversation because you cannot debate the science, since you're not even in the arena. Since you cannot debate the actual science, you lash out like children and throw tantrums.
"This is reification fallacy - assigning properties to something never shown to exist."
You still do not understand, after it being explained to you multiple times, that viruses have been purified from living organisms, but cannot be 100% purified from their host fluids. That doesn't come close to meaning it doesn't exist. That is not reification fallacy.
100% wrong, and you know it. Why go out of your way to mislead people like this? What is your goal? All you have are personal insults?
No one needs to know how proteins are allegedly made in order to see the stupidity of virology.
"viruses have been purified from living organisms, but cannot be 100% purified from their host fluids" - make up your mind, have "viruses" been purified from hosts or not? If you claim yes, back up your claim with actual studies that show purification and something meeting the definition (the actual definition, not your made-up definition).
I've read the methods used in many virology papers (all of them ridiculous) and used freedom of information requests to extensively investigate whether any alleged "viruses" have actually been found in "hosts" and purified so that they could be studied scientifically. Literally hundreds of responses on dozens of "viruses" and nothing.
And numerous FOIs and emails with virologists have also shown that they don't even bother with half-assed attempts to implement controls. Controls are foundational to the scientific method. There is simply no "virus" science, period. It's a psuedoscience, by definition.
Freedom of Information Responses reveal that health/science institutions around the world (212 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 (the alleged convid virus) isolation/purification, anywhere, ever:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions have no record of any “virus” having been found in a host and isolated/purified. Because virology isn’t a science:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-have-no-record-of-any-virus-having-been-isolated-purified-virology-isnt-a-science/
Do virologists perform valid control experiments? Is virology a science?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/do-virologists-perform-valid-control-experiments-is-virology-a-science/
“So What The Hell Is Going On”?
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/what-the-hell-is-going-on/
And lol, both the CDC and Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto have admitted that "viruses" never get purified from "hosts". It's not done in virology.
CDC, bottom of page 3 (I'm sure you'll grasp onto their straw man excuse for not purifying):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CDC-March-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
Mount Sinai admitted it not once but twice (scroll down the page):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/university-of-toronto-sunnybrook-hsc-have-no-record-of-covid-19-virus-isolation/
Hi Jeff, bought your book but haven’t gotten through much of it yet. I have some questions I’m hoping you or your followers might answer to help me get a better grasp of terrain theory.
- I’m as anti-vax as they come. No Covid jabs, never a flu shot. But… Chicken Pox. When I was a child everyone got it. Now? Almost unheard of. My four kids, youngest just turned 18, all were forced to get 2 chicken pox vaccines in order to attend school. No chicken pox, so the chicken pox vaccine at least appears to prevent chicken pox. How? If germ theory is false I would expect all vaccines, without exception, to be entirely useless. If chicken pox results from a child’s cells producing the varicella virus to assist in detoxifying, how could injecting a laboratory attenuated varicella virus into the arm do anything at all?
- What does terrain theory have to say about chronic illness? I’m referring to auto-immune disorders, post-viral syndromes, CFS/ME, chronic Lyme, etc. These are all poorly understood, with very little in the way of consensus over what causes them, or how to treat them. I researched the issue extensively years ago (before I’d ever heard of terrain theory), and found the most compelling explanation to be that most chronic illness is caused by systemic chronic retrovirus infection. In response to this infection, the immune system produces antibodies that have the unfortunate consequence of binding with various receptors and/or neurotransmitters that the nervous system relies upon to properly manage things like heart rate, blood pressure, vasoconstriction, inter-cranial pressure, digestion, etc. This then leads to a cascade of auto-immune symptoms like fatigue, exercise intolerance, tachycardia, brain fog, headaches, joint pain, digestive issues. Why is it that most college kids that come down with mononucleosis (Germ Theory claims caused by EVB infection) recover in a week or two, but some kids develop POTS and can barely climb a flight of stairs for 6 months?
- How about gluten? It is well established that people with chronic illness commonly feel better if they stop eating gluten. The germ theory explanation that I’ve seen is that retroviruses love gluten proteins, and when they encounter them in the bloodstream, they replicate, preventing the immune system from ever getting the upper hand in combatting the infection. Eliminate gluten, starve your viruses, viral loads decrease, auto-immune symptoms mitigate. What is the terrain theory explanation?
Well, thanks for the comment. Retroviruses do not live off of anything because they are not alive. So, that it is biologically impossible for them to rely on gluten. Cells can be disturbed by gluten intolerances, but mainly those severe intolerances have been built up by consuming cooked food throughout one's life that produce mutations in cells. Viruses are merely the result of something else—not the cause.
You have asked a broad question so I will give a broad answer, in regard to chronic illness. Chronic illnesses are caused by many factors. They are caused by malnutrition, accumulation of toxicity which continually irritates cells and thereby causing inflammation, as well as from environmental pollution, chemical preservatives in food, and so on.
Regarding vaccines:
Vaccines work in one sense because they can cause the body to halt current detoxification and shift its energy into removing vaccine toxicity. The body cannot do everything at once, so it must shift resources. Therefore, detoxifications can potentially be halted temporarily. This is determinantal in the long-term for the body because it is preventing the necessary detoxification and development of the body. I have covered this topic at length in the past, so do continue to explore my work further.
Ever think of writing a book?
Hi Raymond, I released a book in early 2020, The Age of Deception. You can purchase it from my website: https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/
Thanks for responding. I've downloaded and read everything you've written including The Age of Deception. I forgot about that. I was thinking about publishing on Amazon. You would expose your book to a wider audience. Or have you tried and been blocked.
Thanks, Ren...
The gram negative and positive bacterium are both part of various healing and digestion processes in the body. What is claimed as negative are natural parts of the body's ecosystem. And many of those labeled negative are essential in regulation of biological functions, such as consumption of degenerative tissue. Gram negatives like E. coli feed the brain and nervous system by consuming food particulate in the large intestine, breaking it down, and excreting it into even finer particulate to deliver to brain cells, for example.
Viruses and bacteria work together in the body to regulate toxic matter, in part, and are major parts of the detoxification system. They have no direct relation per se, except that they coexist and work alongside the body.