This below is explaining through the medical establishment what LONG COVID is. Is this the same peddling of the egg before the chicken in relation to the spike proteins swimming around the blood and cells? Long COVID seems to be a way to bullshit the public into dragging the virus thing out forever.
A study published in March 2022 in Cell found vaccine mRNA in lymph nodes on days 7, 16, and 37 following vaccination. Immunohistochemical staining for spike antigen in mRNA-vaccinated patient lipid nanoparticles in some individuals showed spike protein antigen was still present as late as 60 days following the second vaccine dose.
A November 2021 study in The Journal of Immunology found exosomes expressing spike protein 14 days after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Levels of spike protein increased following booster doses, suggesting the amount of spike protein in the body increases with subsequent vaccination.
A 2021 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases led by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School found circulating SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the plasma of participants vaccinated with Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. Spike protein was detected in blood plasma as early as one day following the first vaccine dose.
In December 2022, I tested positive for coronavirus. During that time, I experienced illness for approximately two weeks, with gradually diminishing effects that lasted for about three weeks until I fully recovered. This duration aligns with what I have observed in myself and others when it comes to most flu and cold viruses. Coronavirus is no exception in terms of the average duration of symptoms. It depends on the level of toxicity of the body.
The concept of Long-COVID arises when the body fails to completely eliminate toxins resulting from viral dissolution or when the detoxification process is incomplete, leading to prolonged symptoms. This phenomenon is not new and is commonly observed with various viruses, despite how the media may portray it as something new.
Regarding the presence of spike proteins in the body, it is logical to find them since vaccines stimulate cells to produce coronaviruses and their spike proteins. The same is true in natural cases of coronavirus infection. After viral dissolution, there may be remnants of spike proteins and other viral components in the body as waste byproducts from the detoxification process. However, the effects of vaccines will be more pronounced because they initiate viral detoxification using synthesized tissue, which acts as a type of adjuvant that can enter cells and cause irritation.
In my opinion, the introduction of these compounds through injection is damaging to cellular health due to the prolonged elevation of the immune response. This prolonged immune response can result in the presence of spike proteins in the body for an extended period, surpassing what would typically occur after a natural infection has subsided.
Spike proteins are enzymatic proteins that attach to compatible cellular receptors and initiate enzymatic hydrolysis of cell membranes, leading to the dissolution of certain cell components. If this effect is prolonged, even beyond the duration of a natural infection, it could potentially cause harm to the body by allowing continued damage to cells, especially since spike proteins are not attached to the whole virus which contains the enzyme mRNA instructions in its capsid core.
Thanks for the response. Does there exist such thing as a spike protein floating around binding to receptors if they are not attached to a virus? Maybe it’s one of the same, like a foundation is to the house so it’s a non starter.
From my perspective, yes. This implies that spikes and their enzymes could be present in the extracellular fluid, potentially causing the dissolution of healthy tissue. This is a departure from their natural selectivity, which is governed by their attachment to the core genome of the entire virus. The detachment from the whole virus and its core likely activates these enzymes, keeping them switched on where they may dissolve healthy tissue.
The spike proteins produced by the virus within a naturally infected person's body are typically attached to the viral particle and not present in isolation as occurs in only a spike protein.
Therefore, in the scenario where an individual has been vaccinated and their cells consistently produce spike proteins at a low level, there is a possibility that this could gradually lead to widespread cellular degeneration. This is because viruses possess solvent properties, and if the immune system remains artificially stimulated for prolonged periods, cells may continuously generate these small viral fragments. Over time, these fragments might potentially induce cellular degeneration due to their solvent nature.
I see your explanation line up with this study located in the Epoch Times. Fragments from cells artificially producing them at an elevated rate, or something to that effect. But not in the unvaccinated. This article states the CDC produced false conclusions of the vaccine as usual.
“In an August 2023 paper published in Biomedicines, researchers found the design of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines allows uncontrolled biodistribution, durability, and persistent bioavailability of the spike protein inside the body after vaccination—which could potentially damage tissues and cause disease.
An August 2023 study in Proteomics Clinical Applications found spike protein in the biological fluids of people six months after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting mRNA may be integrated or retranscribed in some cells.”
Thanks Jeff, this is a very easy to understand explanation and it makes sense. I might forever fe straddling the fince of the matter of virus existence (taking the official definition), But i remain intrigued by the arguments posited by both camps. Contagion is fraud for sure, if I could just convince one other person.....
I believe that keeping an open mind with regard to the findings of science, but not at first foolishly believing whatever they say outright, can benefit one in making progress toward the truth. For instance, the definition of a 'virus' is partially accurate. However, a deeper understanding of disease, and its modes and functions, reveals that the concept of pathogenicity is misleading. This is why I don't find it productive to engage in semantic debates about the term "virus", as many do. The definition of a word can evolve over time, and changing entire words each time new information came to light would be both tedious and wasteful, especially when much of the definition remains the same.
I absolutely agree that creating new words all the time is not possible. However, i think i the case of the word 'virus', wIth the weight that it carries in the public consciousness with regard to the fear based on contagion, that this might be a case of tearing down and starting again with a while new word.
I appreciate your input, Rob, but I hold a different perspective. In my view, the term "virus" is applicable because viruses are chemical products of cells. Likewise, one could also argue for reconsidering the term "bacteria" since it has long been associated (falsely) with widespread mortality and has evoked considerable anxiety throughout history.
I can't argue with you there Jeff, but I do think that these words and there false are so burned in to peoples minds that they need to be scrubbed from the face of the earth and never seen again to be replaced with something else completely different. But then I suppose you could say that about most things weve ever been told.
Another thought about the ‘estimate’ timing of viral outbreaks and this particular scam, not like it happened in pockets/particular places that also had increased pollution or toxins or spills, etc. It happened all over the globe at the same time, thus I feel it was one big psyop that they were successful in instilling fear into the masses...
'They' just renamed bad colds as ‘covid’ and now have idiots running in to get a test for it $$$ testing for which (colds) we never bothered with prior but certainly could have since it is just one coronavirus or another. Ka'ching! They might as well add adenovirus, rhinovirus, metapneumovirus, one-at-a-time to make more money (after of course scaring the public about each, ha ha). I understand what you are saying that ‘they’ could basically guesstimate the timing for population detoxification due to known pollutions, but exactly at the same time the Trump admin was doing so well and needed to be stopped (according to them)? And the Event 201 as you mentioned, they had it all planned... 😑 😣 😩
Trump was also involved in the events. He played a role in organizing Operation Warp Speed and took actions such as closing down the country based on recommendations from the CDC and others, including travel restrictions. He even strongly advocated for mail-in ballots before the election, which he later claimed were used against him. On multiple occasions, he encouraged his supporters to get vaccinated and expressed pride in the vaccines produced during his administration, considering them among the greatest achievements of mankind.
Trump was as much a willing participant in these events as anyone else. The 2020 election took place approximately 13 months after the supposed origin of COVID-19 in China. This provided ample time for those in power to exploit a rise in the annual flu season and use it to their advantage by creating panic through the news media.
Why did Trump unquestioningly comply with most of these measures? He also had financial interests in products like hydroxychloroquine and Regeneron, resulting in financial benefits for him.
Trump consistently displayed xenophobia regarding visitors bringing diseases into the country, particularly blaming Chinese people. This rhetoric was used to justify closing down the country. However, when faced with opposition from his supporters, he began taking a more ambiguous stance, telling state officials to reopen the country.
Trump played a role in fueling whatever agenda those in power sought to achieve, doing little to nothing about it. He retained Dr. Fauci on his advisory team until the end of his term and visited Pfizer and other facilities, praising the achievements made in terms of masking and vaccine development.
The impact of these events extended beyond the United States; the entire world was affected. This suggests a coordinated effort among global governments. Therefore, they did exploit a real event in 2020, which had been unfolding for a few years but was not publicly acknowledged by the media until their fear campaign.
Coordinating such an event requires a real element. It cannot be based on nothing; there must be something tangible or real behind it. Indeed, there has been an increase in viral illnesses for approximately two years, which has gradually receded to lower levels.
The measles outbreak in 2019 was the initial phase of this agenda, where government officials sought to justify changes in laws due to low vaccination rates. They capitalized on an annual rise in measles cases to further their agenda. This pattern is evident in other situations as well, such as mass shootings, where events are used as opportunities to enact laws that limit rights.
When referring to "they," it encompasses government leaders at the state and federal levels who enact policies under the guise of public health.
To answer your question, yes, there were predictions of an increase in viral and other illnesses in 2020, which had been gradually unfolding for a few years prior. These events were exploited in a complex coordination in order to advance governmental control and power.
Who is to say what really is in the heart and mind of a man, Trump. He may have been hemmed into a corner and being ignorant of such things went along to get along, OR, he may have been part of the show. Maybe someday we will know... 😑
His actions speak louder than his words. I'm not concerned about what's in his heart because what he does and how it impacts others is what truly matters. Debating his intentions holds little significance in the grand scheme of things.
Let's be realistic. Trump held the position of President of the United States and wielded significant influence over others (and still does). How many times did he endorse the safety and efficacy of vaccines and encourage his supporters to get vaccinated? Quite a few times. At that point, why should anyone be concerned about what's in his heart?
I've received messages from individuals who were so deluded that they couldn't accept the reality that Trump may not have been what they believed him to be. Some argued that Trump was playing a strategic game of '4D chess' and that he is still the president, suggesting that his statements were made as to not seem obvious. I find such claims to be nonsensical. Those individuals are simply delusional, point blank.
Let's not forget that during an early GOP debate, Trump even suggested that many vaccines could be dangerous. He was pandering for votes at that moment. He will say whatever he believes will help him win. However, when he had the opportunity to help produce a vaccine, he seen that he could take credit for it because of his massive ego. Let's face the reality of the situation.
There are various psychological factors at play here, creating a dichotomy. Due to the media's attacks on Trump, many of his supporters rally behind him regardless of the circumstances (cognitive dissonance). Some people do recognize the truth, but many of them have short memories, and a single incident can sway their support back to him, regardless of his past actions. This is largely a result of mental conditioning, often driven by reactive tendencies.
This widespread reluctance to hold Trump accountable will be the undoing of this country. It doesn't matter if you're a liberal or a Republican. Trump is a tool utilized by those in power and little more than that.
Hi Tulia, yes, that can be confusing for most people.
The answer to your question lies in the cyclical nature of cellular detoxification. Cells, much like the natural world outside our bodies, have specific periods when they express themselves and undergo cleansing processes. Climatic changes, including variations in temperature, pressure, humidity, and oxygen, play a role in informing cellular behavior. Every cell in our body operates on a cyclical timeframe for expression and cleansing. In the case of epithelial cells in the lungs, they tend to express themselves more frequently during winter. This is because environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, pressure changes, and differences between indoor and outdoor temperature can negatively affect lung cells. These factors contribute to the higher occurrence of coronavirus and other viruses during winter.
When entire populations experience viral illnesses, it is important to understand that they do not all develop the exact same virus. Instead, they develop unique variants and strains of the same overall type of virus, in this case, coronavirus. Coronavirus is a commonly occurring virus that tends to manifest at higher levels during winter due to the factors I mentioned above.
During periods of cellular expression, many individuals may start experiencing symptoms either simultaneously or gradually within a short time frame. Available data indicates that every six months (during major seasonal changes), large groups of people locally and worldwide undergo viral illnesses, even when they are geographically distant from one another. Considering the rapid development of symptoms between so many people at once, the notion that a virus is being transmitted between millions of people becomes implausible. Instead, viruses follow a cyclical pattern because cells themselves operate cyclically. It's important to remember that viruses are not alive; cells must first create them for them to exist.
A good analogy is the blossoming tree. Trees blossom when the climate is right for them to do so. Some types of trees (people) bloom at different times compared to other types of trees. However, they all follow a gradual path towards their eventual blossoming.
In my experience, many false claims are made in the fields of vaccinology and microbiology, particularly regarding the pathogenic properties of microorganisms, including viruses. However, I have found that these studies often get it right when it comes to the morphology and many characteristics of these entities. Where they go wrong is when they claim that these entities are pathogenic based solely on limited cellular circumstances. It's important for people to separate themselves from these studies and use the real world as their guide. A study may repeatedly claim that a certain bacteria or virus is dangerous, but if this is not reflected in reality, then the study is largely false. Our ultimate guide should be what happens in the real world, not what the literature claims or theorizes about an entity.
Regarding your last point, it's true that we can't do much about pollution, but we can certainly reduce its effects by consuming the right foods. A healthy diet can help our bodies and its cells harness the nutrients it needs to protect itself against severe cellular stress. If we don't eat properly, any environmental stress can be magnified, sometimes to a significant degree.
This below is explaining through the medical establishment what LONG COVID is. Is this the same peddling of the egg before the chicken in relation to the spike proteins swimming around the blood and cells? Long COVID seems to be a way to bullshit the public into dragging the virus thing out forever.
A study published in March 2022 in Cell found vaccine mRNA in lymph nodes on days 7, 16, and 37 following vaccination. Immunohistochemical staining for spike antigen in mRNA-vaccinated patient lipid nanoparticles in some individuals showed spike protein antigen was still present as late as 60 days following the second vaccine dose.
A November 2021 study in The Journal of Immunology found exosomes expressing spike protein 14 days after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Levels of spike protein increased following booster doses, suggesting the amount of spike protein in the body increases with subsequent vaccination.
A 2021 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases led by researchers at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Harvard Medical School found circulating SARS-CoV-2 proteins in the plasma of participants vaccinated with Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine. Spike protein was detected in blood plasma as early as one day following the first vaccine dose.
In December 2022, I tested positive for coronavirus. During that time, I experienced illness for approximately two weeks, with gradually diminishing effects that lasted for about three weeks until I fully recovered. This duration aligns with what I have observed in myself and others when it comes to most flu and cold viruses. Coronavirus is no exception in terms of the average duration of symptoms. It depends on the level of toxicity of the body.
The concept of Long-COVID arises when the body fails to completely eliminate toxins resulting from viral dissolution or when the detoxification process is incomplete, leading to prolonged symptoms. This phenomenon is not new and is commonly observed with various viruses, despite how the media may portray it as something new.
Regarding the presence of spike proteins in the body, it is logical to find them since vaccines stimulate cells to produce coronaviruses and their spike proteins. The same is true in natural cases of coronavirus infection. After viral dissolution, there may be remnants of spike proteins and other viral components in the body as waste byproducts from the detoxification process. However, the effects of vaccines will be more pronounced because they initiate viral detoxification using synthesized tissue, which acts as a type of adjuvant that can enter cells and cause irritation.
In my opinion, the introduction of these compounds through injection is damaging to cellular health due to the prolonged elevation of the immune response. This prolonged immune response can result in the presence of spike proteins in the body for an extended period, surpassing what would typically occur after a natural infection has subsided.
Spike proteins are enzymatic proteins that attach to compatible cellular receptors and initiate enzymatic hydrolysis of cell membranes, leading to the dissolution of certain cell components. If this effect is prolonged, even beyond the duration of a natural infection, it could potentially cause harm to the body by allowing continued damage to cells, especially since spike proteins are not attached to the whole virus which contains the enzyme mRNA instructions in its capsid core.
Thanks for the response. Does there exist such thing as a spike protein floating around binding to receptors if they are not attached to a virus? Maybe it’s one of the same, like a foundation is to the house so it’s a non starter.
From my perspective, yes. This implies that spikes and their enzymes could be present in the extracellular fluid, potentially causing the dissolution of healthy tissue. This is a departure from their natural selectivity, which is governed by their attachment to the core genome of the entire virus. The detachment from the whole virus and its core likely activates these enzymes, keeping them switched on where they may dissolve healthy tissue.
The spike proteins produced by the virus within a naturally infected person's body are typically attached to the viral particle and not present in isolation as occurs in only a spike protein.
Therefore, in the scenario where an individual has been vaccinated and their cells consistently produce spike proteins at a low level, there is a possibility that this could gradually lead to widespread cellular degeneration. This is because viruses possess solvent properties, and if the immune system remains artificially stimulated for prolonged periods, cells may continuously generate these small viral fragments. Over time, these fragments might potentially induce cellular degeneration due to their solvent nature.
I see your explanation line up with this study located in the Epoch Times. Fragments from cells artificially producing them at an elevated rate, or something to that effect. But not in the unvaccinated. This article states the CDC produced false conclusions of the vaccine as usual.
“In an August 2023 paper published in Biomedicines, researchers found the design of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines allows uncontrolled biodistribution, durability, and persistent bioavailability of the spike protein inside the body after vaccination—which could potentially damage tissues and cause disease.
An August 2023 study in Proteomics Clinical Applications found spike protein in the biological fluids of people six months after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting mRNA may be integrated or retranscribed in some cells.”
Thanks Jeff, this is a very easy to understand explanation and it makes sense. I might forever fe straddling the fince of the matter of virus existence (taking the official definition), But i remain intrigued by the arguments posited by both camps. Contagion is fraud for sure, if I could just convince one other person.....
I believe that keeping an open mind with regard to the findings of science, but not at first foolishly believing whatever they say outright, can benefit one in making progress toward the truth. For instance, the definition of a 'virus' is partially accurate. However, a deeper understanding of disease, and its modes and functions, reveals that the concept of pathogenicity is misleading. This is why I don't find it productive to engage in semantic debates about the term "virus", as many do. The definition of a word can evolve over time, and changing entire words each time new information came to light would be both tedious and wasteful, especially when much of the definition remains the same.
I absolutely agree that creating new words all the time is not possible. However, i think i the case of the word 'virus', wIth the weight that it carries in the public consciousness with regard to the fear based on contagion, that this might be a case of tearing down and starting again with a while new word.
I appreciate your input, Rob, but I hold a different perspective. In my view, the term "virus" is applicable because viruses are chemical products of cells. Likewise, one could also argue for reconsidering the term "bacteria" since it has long been associated (falsely) with widespread mortality and has evoked considerable anxiety throughout history.
I can't argue with you there Jeff, but I do think that these words and there false are so burned in to peoples minds that they need to be scrubbed from the face of the earth and never seen again to be replaced with something else completely different. But then I suppose you could say that about most things weve ever been told.
Another thought about the ‘estimate’ timing of viral outbreaks and this particular scam, not like it happened in pockets/particular places that also had increased pollution or toxins or spills, etc. It happened all over the globe at the same time, thus I feel it was one big psyop that they were successful in instilling fear into the masses...
It happened globally, but most places with the highest concentrations of pollutants experienced the greatest outbreaks.
'They' just renamed bad colds as ‘covid’ and now have idiots running in to get a test for it $$$ testing for which (colds) we never bothered with prior but certainly could have since it is just one coronavirus or another. Ka'ching! They might as well add adenovirus, rhinovirus, metapneumovirus, one-at-a-time to make more money (after of course scaring the public about each, ha ha). I understand what you are saying that ‘they’ could basically guesstimate the timing for population detoxification due to known pollutions, but exactly at the same time the Trump admin was doing so well and needed to be stopped (according to them)? And the Event 201 as you mentioned, they had it all planned... 😑 😣 😩
Trump was also involved in the events. He played a role in organizing Operation Warp Speed and took actions such as closing down the country based on recommendations from the CDC and others, including travel restrictions. He even strongly advocated for mail-in ballots before the election, which he later claimed were used against him. On multiple occasions, he encouraged his supporters to get vaccinated and expressed pride in the vaccines produced during his administration, considering them among the greatest achievements of mankind.
Trump was as much a willing participant in these events as anyone else. The 2020 election took place approximately 13 months after the supposed origin of COVID-19 in China. This provided ample time for those in power to exploit a rise in the annual flu season and use it to their advantage by creating panic through the news media.
Why did Trump unquestioningly comply with most of these measures? He also had financial interests in products like hydroxychloroquine and Regeneron, resulting in financial benefits for him.
Trump consistently displayed xenophobia regarding visitors bringing diseases into the country, particularly blaming Chinese people. This rhetoric was used to justify closing down the country. However, when faced with opposition from his supporters, he began taking a more ambiguous stance, telling state officials to reopen the country.
Trump played a role in fueling whatever agenda those in power sought to achieve, doing little to nothing about it. He retained Dr. Fauci on his advisory team until the end of his term and visited Pfizer and other facilities, praising the achievements made in terms of masking and vaccine development.
The impact of these events extended beyond the United States; the entire world was affected. This suggests a coordinated effort among global governments. Therefore, they did exploit a real event in 2020, which had been unfolding for a few years but was not publicly acknowledged by the media until their fear campaign.
Coordinating such an event requires a real element. It cannot be based on nothing; there must be something tangible or real behind it. Indeed, there has been an increase in viral illnesses for approximately two years, which has gradually receded to lower levels.
The measles outbreak in 2019 was the initial phase of this agenda, where government officials sought to justify changes in laws due to low vaccination rates. They capitalized on an annual rise in measles cases to further their agenda. This pattern is evident in other situations as well, such as mass shootings, where events are used as opportunities to enact laws that limit rights.
When referring to "they," it encompasses government leaders at the state and federal levels who enact policies under the guise of public health.
To answer your question, yes, there were predictions of an increase in viral and other illnesses in 2020, which had been gradually unfolding for a few years prior. These events were exploited in a complex coordination in order to advance governmental control and power.
Who is to say what really is in the heart and mind of a man, Trump. He may have been hemmed into a corner and being ignorant of such things went along to get along, OR, he may have been part of the show. Maybe someday we will know... 😑
His actions speak louder than his words. I'm not concerned about what's in his heart because what he does and how it impacts others is what truly matters. Debating his intentions holds little significance in the grand scheme of things.
Let's be realistic. Trump held the position of President of the United States and wielded significant influence over others (and still does). How many times did he endorse the safety and efficacy of vaccines and encourage his supporters to get vaccinated? Quite a few times. At that point, why should anyone be concerned about what's in his heart?
I've received messages from individuals who were so deluded that they couldn't accept the reality that Trump may not have been what they believed him to be. Some argued that Trump was playing a strategic game of '4D chess' and that he is still the president, suggesting that his statements were made as to not seem obvious. I find such claims to be nonsensical. Those individuals are simply delusional, point blank.
Let's not forget that during an early GOP debate, Trump even suggested that many vaccines could be dangerous. He was pandering for votes at that moment. He will say whatever he believes will help him win. However, when he had the opportunity to help produce a vaccine, he seen that he could take credit for it because of his massive ego. Let's face the reality of the situation.
There are various psychological factors at play here, creating a dichotomy. Due to the media's attacks on Trump, many of his supporters rally behind him regardless of the circumstances (cognitive dissonance). Some people do recognize the truth, but many of them have short memories, and a single incident can sway their support back to him, regardless of his past actions. This is largely a result of mental conditioning, often driven by reactive tendencies.
This widespread reluctance to hold Trump accountable will be the undoing of this country. It doesn't matter if you're a liberal or a Republican. Trump is a tool utilized by those in power and little more than that.
I am confused as to why the same viruses occur in many people at once if they are not contagious.
Hi Tulia, yes, that can be confusing for most people.
The answer to your question lies in the cyclical nature of cellular detoxification. Cells, much like the natural world outside our bodies, have specific periods when they express themselves and undergo cleansing processes. Climatic changes, including variations in temperature, pressure, humidity, and oxygen, play a role in informing cellular behavior. Every cell in our body operates on a cyclical timeframe for expression and cleansing. In the case of epithelial cells in the lungs, they tend to express themselves more frequently during winter. This is because environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, pressure changes, and differences between indoor and outdoor temperature can negatively affect lung cells. These factors contribute to the higher occurrence of coronavirus and other viruses during winter.
When entire populations experience viral illnesses, it is important to understand that they do not all develop the exact same virus. Instead, they develop unique variants and strains of the same overall type of virus, in this case, coronavirus. Coronavirus is a commonly occurring virus that tends to manifest at higher levels during winter due to the factors I mentioned above.
During periods of cellular expression, many individuals may start experiencing symptoms either simultaneously or gradually within a short time frame. Available data indicates that every six months (during major seasonal changes), large groups of people locally and worldwide undergo viral illnesses, even when they are geographically distant from one another. Considering the rapid development of symptoms between so many people at once, the notion that a virus is being transmitted between millions of people becomes implausible. Instead, viruses follow a cyclical pattern because cells themselves operate cyclically. It's important to remember that viruses are not alive; cells must first create them for them to exist.
A good analogy is the blossoming tree. Trees blossom when the climate is right for them to do so. Some types of trees (people) bloom at different times compared to other types of trees. However, they all follow a gradual path towards their eventual blossoming.
In my experience, many false claims are made in the fields of vaccinology and microbiology, particularly regarding the pathogenic properties of microorganisms, including viruses. However, I have found that these studies often get it right when it comes to the morphology and many characteristics of these entities. Where they go wrong is when they claim that these entities are pathogenic based solely on limited cellular circumstances. It's important for people to separate themselves from these studies and use the real world as their guide. A study may repeatedly claim that a certain bacteria or virus is dangerous, but if this is not reflected in reality, then the study is largely false. Our ultimate guide should be what happens in the real world, not what the literature claims or theorizes about an entity.
Regarding your last point, it's true that we can't do much about pollution, but we can certainly reduce its effects by consuming the right foods. A healthy diet can help our bodies and its cells harness the nutrients it needs to protect itself against severe cellular stress. If we don't eat properly, any environmental stress can be magnified, sometimes to a significant degree.