Todd asks,
Jeff, is there ever a situation where viruses in the outside environment negatively affect cells in the human body and cause disease, whether they enter naturally or were inoculated?
How can we close the gap in thinking with regard to the good/bad bacteria paradigm that is so common in culture? I mean, can't two things exist in nature? Isn't there such a thing as bacteria in foods that are helpful to our microbiome, while at the same time, there may be flesh-eating bacteria in lakes or oceans, etc.? Could you break down this push from the medical establishment about reports everywhere of this new flesh-eating bacteria strain?
In the human body, a symbiotic relationship exists with both viruses and bacteria. Cells produce viruses in the presence of degenerative tissue, while bacteria consume and thrive on dead or decaying tissue, acting as scavengers. Bacteria require a food source for their survival and can persist until the tissue is consumed. The difference is that bacteria are microorganisms with survival instincts that consume matter, while viruses are non-living and dissolve matter.
In the case of inoculated viruses, the injection of foreign proteins can disrupt systemic balance, potentially leading to the development of diseases over time.
Skin lice and similar conditions are among the few health conditions that can be considered contagious, as they may be transmitted through direct skin-to-skin contact because you are providing a food source for those microorganisms to thrive on. When it comes to internal issues, there are numerous barriers that organisms must overcome, making such a transfer more challenging and unlikely. In the case of external viruses, the same barriers apply, along with RNA lock-and-key systems.
In the stomach, "harmful" bacteria can sometimes overpower beneficial bacteria if there is an abundance of degenerative tissue present. However, it's important to note that the concept of "good" and "bad" bacteria is relative, as all bacteria present in the body serve a purpose and have a reason for their manifestation. Therefore, we should not view these bacteria as inherently bad or as malicious entities seeking to harm us. In most cases, bacterial infections occur when the body consumes dead or decaying tissue in an attempt to maintain homeostasis. Sometimes, these infections become unregulated due to the level of toxicity, which can harm cells and result in a cycle of infection that spirals out of control.
Certain bacteria, particularly those that develop on cooked food, undergo mutations. These mutations occur when bacteria consume chemical additives and chemical byproducts generated during the cooking process, leading to their degeneration. If we were to consume these mutated bacteria, they could potentially disrupt the bacterial colonies in our gut and cause illness. However, in many cases, the primary culprit for sickness is often the presence of chemical preservatives in the food or from the cooking process itself (such as in burning), rather than the mutated bacteria themselves.
Flesh-eating bacteria thrive on skin that is decaying or dead. I have experienced this multiple times in my life, and some of these infections have persisted for many years and then resolved at a later point. For instance, my father, who worked as a bricklayer using cement containing various chemicals for many years, had his skin penetrated by those substances. Over a span of 15 years, he constantly battled a flesh-eating bacteria on his palms. Eventually, his body was able to eliminate all the accumulated toxins that had permeated the skin and its cells, and the issue resolved.
The body's detoxification process is a gradual one that can extend over several years. It takes approximately 40 years for the body to undergo a complete turnover of cells and tissues, essentially giving us a new cellular body. However, if we do not consume a proper diet, the rebuilding process will be slower and less effective, potentially leading to improper cellular development. Moreover, inadequate nutrition can contribute to the gradual accumulation of toxins in the body over time, slowing the rebuilding process.
The body possesses remarkable wisdom, even incorporating toxins into various outlets like hair. It utilizes every means available to eliminate toxins. This is why the skin, being a major avenue of detoxification, is susceptible to numerous skin conditions, as approximately 90% of toxins are expelled through the skin. Just imagine if this were not the case. We would experience boils within our digestive tract and internal tissues as a regular occurrence, leading to death. As you can surmise, the body would not last in such circumstances.
It is so important to delve deeper into understanding these phenomena beyond what we have been traditionally taught throughout our lives because there is great underlying complexity. With nature and its relationship to the body, every minutia matters.
Jeff Green
Thanks for reading, and if you appreciate this article, consider becoming a paid subscriber.
am i right to say leukocytes accumulate at sites of inflammation by process of chemotaxis (this article perhaps pertinent?https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4873021/)In light of your excellent Newsletter article relating to inflammation ,can you say if you see the mRNA vaccine inhibiting this response ?
Jeff .I read in the field of study regarding plant toxins -toxic non protein amino acids (NPAA`s) that "the effects of NPAAs on human health are not well understood..... a number of plants that contain NPAAs has been shown to have acutely toxic effects in humans. The key questions that remain unanswered are to what extent can NPAAs enter the food chain and what are the effects of a chronic low-level exposure to toxic plant NPAAs?" (https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-6464-4_9.) Can you see any link here to the stance taken by vegetarians activists who argue for government food policies aimed at reducing meat consumption in the populace ,that only plant based food is now the way forward ,improving human health and protecting the environment from the polluting effects associated with industrial mass meat production?