am i right to say leukocytes accumulate at sites of inflammation by process of chemotaxis (this article perhaps pertinent?https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4873021/)In light of your excellent Newsletter article relating to inflammation ,can you say if you see the mRNA vaccine inhibiting this response ?
Ted, the introduction of foreign substances into your body through injection can inevitably trigger inflammation. If the immune response remains heightened for prolonged periods, it indicates the presence of inflammation. An elevated immune response can be considered a form of inflammation. Whenever nutrients rush to a specific area to aid in the healing process, some degree of inflammation is always present, and thus white cells will be present. Even a minor scratch on your skin results in inflammation. Therefore, it is true that all vaccines can induce inflammation at varying levels, with certain vaccines causing more inflammation than others.
Inflammation can indeed occur as a result of both current mRNA vaccines and past vaccines, and I believe it is important to view both types as equally concerning. While there is currently more attention given to the inflammatory effects of mRNA vaccines, it is crucial not to disregard the historical risks associated with highly toxic components such as thimerosal mercury and other metallic adjuvants found in previous vaccines, which, in my perspective, pose even greater dangers. Mercury is the most toxic compound to man, and mRNA does not surpass it in that regard.
Jeff .I read in the field of study regarding plant toxins -toxic non protein amino acids (NPAA`s) that "the effects of NPAAs on human health are not well understood..... a number of plants that contain NPAAs has been shown to have acutely toxic effects in humans. The key questions that remain unanswered are to what extent can NPAAs enter the food chain and what are the effects of a chronic low-level exposure to toxic plant NPAAs?" (https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-6464-4_9.) Can you see any link here to the stance taken by vegetarians activists who argue for government food policies aimed at reducing meat consumption in the populace ,that only plant based food is now the way forward ,improving human health and protecting the environment from the polluting effects associated with industrial mass meat production?
It's possible. I utilize raw plant juices and occasionally incorporate raw vegetable juices into my own diet. I am aware of their significance in terms of health and nutrition. However, they can never fully substitute animal foods. Without animal foods, I would not be healthy today. Unfortunately, many individuals tend to overcook and burn their meat and animal products, resulting in the formation of harmful acrylamide toxins and other unidentified cooking byproducts, most of which are known to be carcinogenic. Cooking, particularly excessive cooking and burning of plants and vegetables, can lead to mutations in plant enzymes, causing disruptions in the body and the cauterization of their sugars due to the heating process.
The concern about non-protein amino acids (NPAAs) in foods other than plants does not bother me in the slightest. The agricultural and food industries appear to have no qualms about culling millions of healthy animals due to fears of rampant virus spread on farms. I'm quite certain that this also has a negative environmental impact. The issue lies not with the animals themselves, but rather with their rearing methods. For instance, if appropriate measures were taken, cows could freely graze on grass, providing sufficient beef for anyone on Earth who desires it, at least considering the current population growth. However, implementing radical changes would be necessary. In short: Industry and how they operate are the main problem.
Plant-based food, being artificial and highly processed, would have severe and detrimental effects on the overall well-being of everyone on the planet if they were forced to consume it for extended periods. Vegetarians have tried to, over a long period of time, slander the consumption of meat, which is a natural part of the evolution of mankind. Without meat, man would not be here.
Parts of scientific research have been inundated by individuals who have falsely claimed that certain types of meat cause disease. However, all of these studies focus exclusively on cooked meat and disregard the consumption of raw meats. The differences between the two can be significant. Through my own studies, I have found that cooked meat does not contribute to plaque buildup or heart disease because saturated fat remains stable under heat, and the body is capable of keeping it in a liquid state without solidifying. In contrast, plant fats exhibit opposing characteristics and can significantly contribute to such diseases. Nevertheless, there may be other harmful effects resulting from overcooking meats, which most studies fail to acknowledge. Raw meats do not cause disease of any type.
As a consequence of this form of "propaganda," there is widespread confusion surrounding these topics, leading many individuals to struggle with understanding the complete picture of health. Consequently, they tend to follow detrimental health trends, often adopting biologically deficient diets due to a lack of understanding of basic human biology. Various misconceptions influence people, ranging from misinterpretations of religious texts, such as the Bible, to subjective moral judgments, none of which respect nature as it truly exists. I have personally witnessed and experienced much of this firsthand, engaging in conversations with many individuals affected by these beliefs. Their disagreements are rooted more in emotion rather than factual evidence. Furthermore, their biological arguments are severely flawed. Given the opportunity for a face-to-face discussion, I could effortlessly demonstrate, through my own words and first-hand experience, why these foods are inadequate for supporting the human organism.
The updated version of my book delves into these various topics to raise awareness and help individuals understand what truly constitutes proper nutrition for the body.
Hi Horsea, I updated the article to address that more clearly. My intent was that viruses and bacteria both manifest in the presence of degenerative tissue.
am i right to say leukocytes accumulate at sites of inflammation by process of chemotaxis (this article perhaps pertinent?https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4873021/)In light of your excellent Newsletter article relating to inflammation ,can you say if you see the mRNA vaccine inhibiting this response ?
Ted, the introduction of foreign substances into your body through injection can inevitably trigger inflammation. If the immune response remains heightened for prolonged periods, it indicates the presence of inflammation. An elevated immune response can be considered a form of inflammation. Whenever nutrients rush to a specific area to aid in the healing process, some degree of inflammation is always present, and thus white cells will be present. Even a minor scratch on your skin results in inflammation. Therefore, it is true that all vaccines can induce inflammation at varying levels, with certain vaccines causing more inflammation than others.
Inflammation can indeed occur as a result of both current mRNA vaccines and past vaccines, and I believe it is important to view both types as equally concerning. While there is currently more attention given to the inflammatory effects of mRNA vaccines, it is crucial not to disregard the historical risks associated with highly toxic components such as thimerosal mercury and other metallic adjuvants found in previous vaccines, which, in my perspective, pose even greater dangers. Mercury is the most toxic compound to man, and mRNA does not surpass it in that regard.
Jeff .I read in the field of study regarding plant toxins -toxic non protein amino acids (NPAA`s) that "the effects of NPAAs on human health are not well understood..... a number of plants that contain NPAAs has been shown to have acutely toxic effects in humans. The key questions that remain unanswered are to what extent can NPAAs enter the food chain and what are the effects of a chronic low-level exposure to toxic plant NPAAs?" (https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-6464-4_9.) Can you see any link here to the stance taken by vegetarians activists who argue for government food policies aimed at reducing meat consumption in the populace ,that only plant based food is now the way forward ,improving human health and protecting the environment from the polluting effects associated with industrial mass meat production?
It's possible. I utilize raw plant juices and occasionally incorporate raw vegetable juices into my own diet. I am aware of their significance in terms of health and nutrition. However, they can never fully substitute animal foods. Without animal foods, I would not be healthy today. Unfortunately, many individuals tend to overcook and burn their meat and animal products, resulting in the formation of harmful acrylamide toxins and other unidentified cooking byproducts, most of which are known to be carcinogenic. Cooking, particularly excessive cooking and burning of plants and vegetables, can lead to mutations in plant enzymes, causing disruptions in the body and the cauterization of their sugars due to the heating process.
The concern about non-protein amino acids (NPAAs) in foods other than plants does not bother me in the slightest. The agricultural and food industries appear to have no qualms about culling millions of healthy animals due to fears of rampant virus spread on farms. I'm quite certain that this also has a negative environmental impact. The issue lies not with the animals themselves, but rather with their rearing methods. For instance, if appropriate measures were taken, cows could freely graze on grass, providing sufficient beef for anyone on Earth who desires it, at least considering the current population growth. However, implementing radical changes would be necessary. In short: Industry and how they operate are the main problem.
Plant-based food, being artificial and highly processed, would have severe and detrimental effects on the overall well-being of everyone on the planet if they were forced to consume it for extended periods. Vegetarians have tried to, over a long period of time, slander the consumption of meat, which is a natural part of the evolution of mankind. Without meat, man would not be here.
Parts of scientific research have been inundated by individuals who have falsely claimed that certain types of meat cause disease. However, all of these studies focus exclusively on cooked meat and disregard the consumption of raw meats. The differences between the two can be significant. Through my own studies, I have found that cooked meat does not contribute to plaque buildup or heart disease because saturated fat remains stable under heat, and the body is capable of keeping it in a liquid state without solidifying. In contrast, plant fats exhibit opposing characteristics and can significantly contribute to such diseases. Nevertheless, there may be other harmful effects resulting from overcooking meats, which most studies fail to acknowledge. Raw meats do not cause disease of any type.
As a consequence of this form of "propaganda," there is widespread confusion surrounding these topics, leading many individuals to struggle with understanding the complete picture of health. Consequently, they tend to follow detrimental health trends, often adopting biologically deficient diets due to a lack of understanding of basic human biology. Various misconceptions influence people, ranging from misinterpretations of religious texts, such as the Bible, to subjective moral judgments, none of which respect nature as it truly exists. I have personally witnessed and experienced much of this firsthand, engaging in conversations with many individuals affected by these beliefs. Their disagreements are rooted more in emotion rather than factual evidence. Furthermore, their biological arguments are severely flawed. Given the opportunity for a face-to-face discussion, I could effortlessly demonstrate, through my own words and first-hand experience, why these foods are inadequate for supporting the human organism.
The updated version of my book delves into these various topics to raise awareness and help individuals understand what truly constitutes proper nutrition for the body.
Todd was wondering about viruses. Bacteria are a different situation altogether. Thank you.
Hi Horsea, I updated the article to address that more clearly. My intent was that viruses and bacteria both manifest in the presence of degenerative tissue.