This is part two of my response to Tom Cowan’s June 25th, 2025 webinar, in which he directly addresses me and reiterates his claim that the scientific method is a strict, uniform set of rules.
I shouldn't be surprised but it was disappointing to see Tom Cowan never made any effort to reply to any of your rebuttals here, on Rumble or X. I think that shows he has no interest in engaging with anyone who might disagree with his no-virus positions.
Cowan's webinar yesterday started with criticizing Dr. Christopher Shaw because he expressed support for viruses in an interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. As usual, Cowan couldn't be bothered to look up Shaw's credentials. He is Professor in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, with cross appointments in the Department of Experimental Medicine and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience. He is also author of more than 100 peer-reviewed articles, numerous book chapters and special reviews, and editor of four books on neuroscience themes. Cowan, of course, claims Shaw and his ilk are scientifically illiterate. He then brings up some of Christine Massey's insufferable nonsense and goes on to talk about exploding invisible unicorns.
I guess it's just as well you got no engagement. People like Cowan just want to pose as authorities when they actually have virtually no in-depth understanding of the subjects on which they pontificate.
That’s precisely why I said credentials don’t matter in this context. You could get ten PhDs, win a Nobel Prize, and resurrect Einstein to co-sign your papers—and it still wouldn’t matter. You’re claiming viruses exist, and that’s the issue for these people.
I shouldn't be surprised but it was disappointing to see Tom Cowan never made any effort to reply to any of your rebuttals here, on Rumble or X. I think that shows he has no interest in engaging with anyone who might disagree with his no-virus positions.
Cowan's webinar yesterday started with criticizing Dr. Christopher Shaw because he expressed support for viruses in an interview with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny. As usual, Cowan couldn't be bothered to look up Shaw's credentials. He is Professor in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences at the University of British Columbia, with cross appointments in the Department of Experimental Medicine and the Graduate Program in Neuroscience. He is also author of more than 100 peer-reviewed articles, numerous book chapters and special reviews, and editor of four books on neuroscience themes. Cowan, of course, claims Shaw and his ilk are scientifically illiterate. He then brings up some of Christine Massey's insufferable nonsense and goes on to talk about exploding invisible unicorns.
I guess it's just as well you got no engagement. People like Cowan just want to pose as authorities when they actually have virtually no in-depth understanding of the subjects on which they pontificate.
That’s precisely why I said credentials don’t matter in this context. You could get ten PhDs, win a Nobel Prize, and resurrect Einstein to co-sign your papers—and it still wouldn’t matter. You’re claiming viruses exist, and that’s the issue for these people.