Love this! Definitely puts the viral detoxification that our bodies do for themselves in a positive light!
Question: From your last paragraph, ‘Toxic cells and tissues are marked by immune cells’, would this be the formation of antibodies and would they be antibodies to those toxic cells/tissues and not to the virus itself? How is it the virus is ‘regulated’? Sorry, guess that is a few questions all in one chain of thought... thank you..
Yes, there would be antibodies to toxic cells. The virus is regulated by white cells during the infection and inflammation responses.
Infection can occur in at least two ways. One, an object must be trapped in the body somewhere and unable to be easily removed (Ie: splinter, dead cells, or toxin). Two, waste debris from cellular breakdown rise to a level that is a strain on the body. In the latter case, bacteria and cells widely manifest in the area(s) of damage by concentrating nutrient flow into those areas. This is the inflammation and infection response. These are integral to almost all wound and disease healing, especially inflammation/swelling. First, an insult occurs, then, a response—be that bacterial, viral, parasitical, or otherwise. Each type used depends on the nature of the substance. Each has its own role.
Viruses may be marked for removal by antibodies only after they have reached a certain point of replication in the detoxification process. During the final stages of detoxification, fever occurs to reduce or halt all microbial and viral replication. This is the healing and resolution phase.
'Viruses may be marked for removal by antibodies only after they have reached a certain point of replication in the detoxification process.' --where do you get this from? Those abys are pretty smart to know when to mark viruses for removal/halt viral replication.
Cells, primarily macrophages (white cells), induce fever. They thermally regulate infection and its processes. If viral or bacterial replication overloads the body, fever increases to regulate/slow their replication. In this way, viral and bacterial levels are monitored by immune cells to determine their level and rate. If this were not the case, we would observe the endless replication of bacteria and viruses and it would result in the unregulated destruction of a whole organism every time it was to occur.
Macrophages, like other cells, are able to do many things. They engulf, and they release interleukin to initiate fever, among other things. They regulate temperature as well. Think of a cell like your own body. It can do more than one thing. It can run, sit, jump, hold and release, eat, excrete and sweat, speak and send messages, and more.
Yours is the best explanation of viruses I've come across. Unless a better explanation comes along, I accept it. What leaves a gap in my understanding is how you come to your assertions. The images you show go beyond what light and electron microscopes are capable of. So I presume they are computer generated. Since viruses are too small to be seen, I'm left with the impression that their characteristics are inferred by analogy with known mechanisms in the body. For example, your description of the structure of a virus is analogous to a lipoprotein.
Again, I'm not disputing you (I'm not remotely qualified). I'm asking a standard scientific question: how did you arrive at your conclusions?
Thank you, Raymond. The main image is a 3D rendering that I modeled to show what a virus would look like at that magnification if it were possible. The upper image is a real electron image of the influenza A virus and is not computer generated. Viruses are too small to be seen without using electron microscopy because they do not easily reflect light, but some are larger than others and therefore easier to resolve and be seen.
Cells and most other agents, like lysosomes, phagocytes, and so on, all contain fat lipids. Most enveloped viruses have a thicker fat lipid layer as their covering and are slightly different than other viruses without an envelope. In cells, these lipid bilayers are able to stretch, expand, and repair themselves naturally. They are able to form bonds with other cells (cell mitosis) and engulf and expel particulate (endocytosis, exocytosis). They also protect the entity it surrounds. You may find the same behavior by taking oil and placing it in water. There, you will notice similar actions in how our cells behave.
My assertions are from my study of the cell, proteins, and enzymes, and how they are assembled by the body. In that, I find parts of viruses follow the same mechanics as all other living cells. This should not be surprising, since viruses are not separate from the body. You see a similar nature of a virus wall as you do something like the wall of a phagocyte. This is a further indication that viruses are intelligent creations by the body.
Yes. Your last paragraph opens up a line of reasoning that supports the production of viruses. It is that our cells have the intelligence and capacity to produce a host of nonliving molecules.
A major fallacy in mainstream thinking is to mix fact with fiction. They accept as fact that viruses are not living and that they are produced by human cells. Then they go off on a tangent and ascribe powers that only a living organism can have.
The difference between molecules and organisms, I believe, has to do with electrical activity. Molecules exhibit unique magnetic patterns and are electrically inert. Organisms are electrically active capable of altering their magnetic patterns.
I'm convinced you are on the right path. To take accepted mainstream facts and show where they veer off course would go a long way towards making your case. Show no mercy!
Well put, and I agree. Organisms by definition must contain some component for digestion. Living cells contain a nucleus, glandular function, respiration and expiration, digestion and expulsion, and contain some form of motility. Cells are able to synthesize their own proteins. Cells, for example, are able to divide into virtually identical twins through cell mitosis. The process of chromosome separation through anaphase is particularly electric in nature, wherein the electrical force of the cell propels outward to cause the cell to divide. They have the ability, through electrical pathways and signals, to carry these functions out.
All cells, and most other agents, have electric signals by which they communicate and function. The nerve system and its cells are heavily reliant on these signals. Even viruses are carried through the body by 'zeta potential', which is simply static electricity that surrounds all objects in a body keeping them in suspension.
What you wrote is exactly why I believe it is very shortsighted to claim viruses are non-existent, as seems to be popular, when the body is able to produce many similar enzymes for cleansing. On a logical deduction basis, it should be obvious that the likelihood of the existence of something like a viral enzyme (virus) is high. Claiming none of these things exist is not the way forward. That is the easy way out and is denying the very needs of the body itself and disregards a lot of real and true biological science.
Thanks Jeff g!! What is this talk about spike proteins in the vaccine causing liver damage and other diseases? I believe this is a cover for vaccine injury. I think you’ve stated that spike proteins cannot be manufactured this way and if so doesn’t that prove your theory that when poisons are injected the body produces a spike protein virus????
Jeff I see they are preparing us for another Ebola HIV Covid type thing with the monkey pox propaganda. Also a malnutrition/poisoning ie. vaccine induced disease?
The claim that most Covid cases are now among the vaccinated are signs that the paid opposition is in full force propaganda mode and is the same ole racket of deception and confusion.
The claim is that the cells in the body are taught to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. I addressed this claim a couple of years ago. I have since further developed my understanding of the spike protein itself. I still assert that the cell is not producing a spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. That makes absolutely no sense because a cell produces whole protein structures. To merely produce a part of a virus that is only 1% of the entirety of the viral structure without the cell knowing how it is constructed, seems biologically absurd. Instead, the synthesized protein carrier which is bound with a toxic adjuvant enters cells and causes an epigenetic change in the DNA sequence of the cell. Then, when those cells divide, those changes are carried over into every cell thereafter.
Thank you. So I guess this alternative mainstream, anti vaxx movement has excepted the premise of germ theory virus causation and all this chatter is that they are portions of cell called spike protein attacking the body, liver, heart etc….Its weird don’t want to admit the adjuvants serums or tissue may be the problem. I believe it is the toxicity now and more statistical manipulation with media egging it on. Lots of confusion whirling around. As you say they make us argue nonsense all day without knowing it. Thank you for helping wake up our minds to these modern world deceptions like The WHO. and the United Nations. I became very interested in this obvious contradiction around the clamp down period and had to find the truth of the matter or get close to it. Then I found your website and bought your book. It was a real eye opener. A lot of questions were answered.
Jeff what are they trying to genetically alter our DNA into?
Thank you, Todd, for the kind comments. I think there is a vast misunderstanding about what spike proteins even are. They are merely glycoproteins that jut out of the virus capsid (lipid bilayer wall). Those proteins are on literally all living cells in the body, including many non-living agents, like enzymes. This is how cells communicate with each other, in part. It is how the body functions cellularly.
With that said, you are correct—so-called alternative mainstream, anti-vax groups have adopted many parts of Germ Theory ideology and do not even realize it. Many in these alternative circles claim something along the lines of "Well, some germs do cause disease, and some things are pathogenic." Then, they go on to list diseases they think are contagious. If you claim spike proteins are being transmitted and causing disease, you believe in contagious diseases. If you believe vaccine shedding is contagious based on spike proteins being transmitted and then replicating in another body, you are perpetuating Germ Theory.
Their goal, according to those like Klaus Schwab, is to re-engineer mankind into a type of 'hybrid' that is subservient to the state (docile, weakened), and willing to be tracked and monitored through a biomedical tyranny. A slow steady trickle of increasing vaccines into the population will serve to reduce the natural DNA integrity of mankind over a period of the next 50 years. Contrary to what many think, this recent vaccine is not the vaccine that will kill millions in one fell swoop. No, that will not happen. Instead, they will slowly increase vaccine rates, and 'new' diseases will emerge to justify these vaccines and treatments and social changes.
If they can suppress the natural body from detoxifying properly, disease will increase further in a population. Without detoxification, there is death of the organism. When toxins reach a high enough level in a population, you will have a crisis event wherein people will begin noticing very obvious symptoms of disease where they have no idea where it came from—years past the point of vaccination. My research has revealed to me that they are at least changing the way the detoxification system behaves by suppressing the production of cytokines, which is a major part of infection and healing.
So does a virus such as SARS-CoV-2 actually exist and, if it does, is it simply a specific strain produced by the body in reaction to a specific toxin? In other words, different types of viruses are generated in response to different types of toxins, and those among us exposed to the same toxin would "test positive" for the same virus?
Hi Kevin, there is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists, and out of 80,000+ animals tested, it has never been found to naturally occur in any animal. So, I must conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade synthesized virus existing only in a lab setting and is not a naturally occurring virus in mammalians.
However, if SARS-CoV-2 did exist, it would not be much different than any other coronavirus or flu virus. There is hardly any notable difference in their symptoms, and both deal in the respiratory system and its cells. Although, like flu, they are usually more of a whole-body detoxifier and are more generalistic than polio or hepatitis virus, which are stationed in the spine or the liver, respectively.
One should not necessarily expect the same toxin to create the same viral load in all individuals. In reality, it would be highly unpredictable. Even so, it may cause cells to begin to produce similar solvents among those who receive the toxin. So yes, you may observe many people who are exposed to a toxin will develop similar strains of a virus if you take millions of people into account. This is observed in those who receive vaccines. But that is also not the entire case, since vaccines can elicit many other outcomes—not just the disease it is purporting to prevent.
Thanks for the reply, Jeff. I will probably have more questions as I educate myself further on these topics and really appreciate that you take the time to respond to your readers.
You need raw milk, especially fermented milk, like raw kefir, which will feed the gut trillions of naturally occurring raw bacteria. You need raw meats, and raw eggs incorporated into the diet. And the diet must be followed for a period of years and thereon for the rest of one's life.
Plastic bottles are doable if they are kept cool and are BPA free.
Glass is always best but is not always available. Tap water is far worse than any plastic bottled water. Keep that in mind.
Only buy unprocessed raw meats, and if you cook them, do not burn them or you will produce acrylamides. If you must fry, use butter or lard. These are stable animal fats with high heat points, except butter will burn if too highly heated. Peanut oil is also a good oil for cooking.
Raw animal fats are always preferable and should be incorporated into the diet.
I advocate for the consumption of raw meat, raw eggs and raw milk. Even if a person eats all cooked meats, incorporating such raw foods into their diet will help the body.
one more question if you don't mind...what's your opinion on NAC (acetylcysteine) ? A legit detox agent? Do you have any favourite detox foods or supplements?
Love this! Definitely puts the viral detoxification that our bodies do for themselves in a positive light!
Question: From your last paragraph, ‘Toxic cells and tissues are marked by immune cells’, would this be the formation of antibodies and would they be antibodies to those toxic cells/tissues and not to the virus itself? How is it the virus is ‘regulated’? Sorry, guess that is a few questions all in one chain of thought... thank you..
Yes, there would be antibodies to toxic cells. The virus is regulated by white cells during the infection and inflammation responses.
Infection can occur in at least two ways. One, an object must be trapped in the body somewhere and unable to be easily removed (Ie: splinter, dead cells, or toxin). Two, waste debris from cellular breakdown rise to a level that is a strain on the body. In the latter case, bacteria and cells widely manifest in the area(s) of damage by concentrating nutrient flow into those areas. This is the inflammation and infection response. These are integral to almost all wound and disease healing, especially inflammation/swelling. First, an insult occurs, then, a response—be that bacterial, viral, parasitical, or otherwise. Each type used depends on the nature of the substance. Each has its own role.
Viruses may be marked for removal by antibodies only after they have reached a certain point of replication in the detoxification process. During the final stages of detoxification, fever occurs to reduce or halt all microbial and viral replication. This is the healing and resolution phase.
'Viruses may be marked for removal by antibodies only after they have reached a certain point of replication in the detoxification process.' --where do you get this from? Those abys are pretty smart to know when to mark viruses for removal/halt viral replication.
Cells, primarily macrophages (white cells), induce fever. They thermally regulate infection and its processes. If viral or bacterial replication overloads the body, fever increases to regulate/slow their replication. In this way, viral and bacterial levels are monitored by immune cells to determine their level and rate. If this were not the case, we would observe the endless replication of bacteria and viruses and it would result in the unregulated destruction of a whole organism every time it was to occur.
I thought too that macrophages engulfed the 'debris' for removal, did not know they incited a fever...
Macrophages, like other cells, are able to do many things. They engulf, and they release interleukin to initiate fever, among other things. They regulate temperature as well. Think of a cell like your own body. It can do more than one thing. It can run, sit, jump, hold and release, eat, excrete and sweat, speak and send messages, and more.
Excellent report (20 minute talk) on the effects of EMF/RF on the microbiome.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/v8b2iBWo6uuB/
By the by, a good friend of mine refers to human beings as "fermenter vats on stilts". I thought you might enjoy that image.
Yours is the best explanation of viruses I've come across. Unless a better explanation comes along, I accept it. What leaves a gap in my understanding is how you come to your assertions. The images you show go beyond what light and electron microscopes are capable of. So I presume they are computer generated. Since viruses are too small to be seen, I'm left with the impression that their characteristics are inferred by analogy with known mechanisms in the body. For example, your description of the structure of a virus is analogous to a lipoprotein.
Again, I'm not disputing you (I'm not remotely qualified). I'm asking a standard scientific question: how did you arrive at your conclusions?
Thank you, Raymond. The main image is a 3D rendering that I modeled to show what a virus would look like at that magnification if it were possible. The upper image is a real electron image of the influenza A virus and is not computer generated. Viruses are too small to be seen without using electron microscopy because they do not easily reflect light, but some are larger than others and therefore easier to resolve and be seen.
Cells and most other agents, like lysosomes, phagocytes, and so on, all contain fat lipids. Most enveloped viruses have a thicker fat lipid layer as their covering and are slightly different than other viruses without an envelope. In cells, these lipid bilayers are able to stretch, expand, and repair themselves naturally. They are able to form bonds with other cells (cell mitosis) and engulf and expel particulate (endocytosis, exocytosis). They also protect the entity it surrounds. You may find the same behavior by taking oil and placing it in water. There, you will notice similar actions in how our cells behave.
My assertions are from my study of the cell, proteins, and enzymes, and how they are assembled by the body. In that, I find parts of viruses follow the same mechanics as all other living cells. This should not be surprising, since viruses are not separate from the body. You see a similar nature of a virus wall as you do something like the wall of a phagocyte. This is a further indication that viruses are intelligent creations by the body.
Yes. Your last paragraph opens up a line of reasoning that supports the production of viruses. It is that our cells have the intelligence and capacity to produce a host of nonliving molecules.
A major fallacy in mainstream thinking is to mix fact with fiction. They accept as fact that viruses are not living and that they are produced by human cells. Then they go off on a tangent and ascribe powers that only a living organism can have.
The difference between molecules and organisms, I believe, has to do with electrical activity. Molecules exhibit unique magnetic patterns and are electrically inert. Organisms are electrically active capable of altering their magnetic patterns.
I'm convinced you are on the right path. To take accepted mainstream facts and show where they veer off course would go a long way towards making your case. Show no mercy!
Well put, and I agree. Organisms by definition must contain some component for digestion. Living cells contain a nucleus, glandular function, respiration and expiration, digestion and expulsion, and contain some form of motility. Cells are able to synthesize their own proteins. Cells, for example, are able to divide into virtually identical twins through cell mitosis. The process of chromosome separation through anaphase is particularly electric in nature, wherein the electrical force of the cell propels outward to cause the cell to divide. They have the ability, through electrical pathways and signals, to carry these functions out.
All cells, and most other agents, have electric signals by which they communicate and function. The nerve system and its cells are heavily reliant on these signals. Even viruses are carried through the body by 'zeta potential', which is simply static electricity that surrounds all objects in a body keeping them in suspension.
What you wrote is exactly why I believe it is very shortsighted to claim viruses are non-existent, as seems to be popular, when the body is able to produce many similar enzymes for cleansing. On a logical deduction basis, it should be obvious that the likelihood of the existence of something like a viral enzyme (virus) is high. Claiming none of these things exist is not the way forward. That is the easy way out and is denying the very needs of the body itself and disregards a lot of real and true biological science.
Thanks Jeff g!! What is this talk about spike proteins in the vaccine causing liver damage and other diseases? I believe this is a cover for vaccine injury. I think you’ve stated that spike proteins cannot be manufactured this way and if so doesn’t that prove your theory that when poisons are injected the body produces a spike protein virus????
Jeff I see they are preparing us for another Ebola HIV Covid type thing with the monkey pox propaganda. Also a malnutrition/poisoning ie. vaccine induced disease?
The claim that most Covid cases are now among the vaccinated are signs that the paid opposition is in full force propaganda mode and is the same ole racket of deception and confusion.
The claim is that the cells in the body are taught to make the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. I addressed this claim a couple of years ago. I have since further developed my understanding of the spike protein itself. I still assert that the cell is not producing a spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. That makes absolutely no sense because a cell produces whole protein structures. To merely produce a part of a virus that is only 1% of the entirety of the viral structure without the cell knowing how it is constructed, seems biologically absurd. Instead, the synthesized protein carrier which is bound with a toxic adjuvant enters cells and causes an epigenetic change in the DNA sequence of the cell. Then, when those cells divide, those changes are carried over into every cell thereafter.
Thank you. So I guess this alternative mainstream, anti vaxx movement has excepted the premise of germ theory virus causation and all this chatter is that they are portions of cell called spike protein attacking the body, liver, heart etc….Its weird don’t want to admit the adjuvants serums or tissue may be the problem. I believe it is the toxicity now and more statistical manipulation with media egging it on. Lots of confusion whirling around. As you say they make us argue nonsense all day without knowing it. Thank you for helping wake up our minds to these modern world deceptions like The WHO. and the United Nations. I became very interested in this obvious contradiction around the clamp down period and had to find the truth of the matter or get close to it. Then I found your website and bought your book. It was a real eye opener. A lot of questions were answered.
Jeff what are they trying to genetically alter our DNA into?
Thank you, Todd, for the kind comments. I think there is a vast misunderstanding about what spike proteins even are. They are merely glycoproteins that jut out of the virus capsid (lipid bilayer wall). Those proteins are on literally all living cells in the body, including many non-living agents, like enzymes. This is how cells communicate with each other, in part. It is how the body functions cellularly.
With that said, you are correct—so-called alternative mainstream, anti-vax groups have adopted many parts of Germ Theory ideology and do not even realize it. Many in these alternative circles claim something along the lines of "Well, some germs do cause disease, and some things are pathogenic." Then, they go on to list diseases they think are contagious. If you claim spike proteins are being transmitted and causing disease, you believe in contagious diseases. If you believe vaccine shedding is contagious based on spike proteins being transmitted and then replicating in another body, you are perpetuating Germ Theory.
Their goal, according to those like Klaus Schwab, is to re-engineer mankind into a type of 'hybrid' that is subservient to the state (docile, weakened), and willing to be tracked and monitored through a biomedical tyranny. A slow steady trickle of increasing vaccines into the population will serve to reduce the natural DNA integrity of mankind over a period of the next 50 years. Contrary to what many think, this recent vaccine is not the vaccine that will kill millions in one fell swoop. No, that will not happen. Instead, they will slowly increase vaccine rates, and 'new' diseases will emerge to justify these vaccines and treatments and social changes.
If they can suppress the natural body from detoxifying properly, disease will increase further in a population. Without detoxification, there is death of the organism. When toxins reach a high enough level in a population, you will have a crisis event wherein people will begin noticing very obvious symptoms of disease where they have no idea where it came from—years past the point of vaccination. My research has revealed to me that they are at least changing the way the detoxification system behaves by suppressing the production of cytokines, which is a major part of infection and healing.
*Edited to be more concise.*
Hi Jeff,
So does a virus such as SARS-CoV-2 actually exist and, if it does, is it simply a specific strain produced by the body in reaction to a specific toxin? In other words, different types of viruses are generated in response to different types of toxins, and those among us exposed to the same toxin would "test positive" for the same virus?
Hi Kevin, there is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists, and out of 80,000+ animals tested, it has never been found to naturally occur in any animal. So, I must conclude that SARS-CoV-2 is a manmade synthesized virus existing only in a lab setting and is not a naturally occurring virus in mammalians.
However, if SARS-CoV-2 did exist, it would not be much different than any other coronavirus or flu virus. There is hardly any notable difference in their symptoms, and both deal in the respiratory system and its cells. Although, like flu, they are usually more of a whole-body detoxifier and are more generalistic than polio or hepatitis virus, which are stationed in the spine or the liver, respectively.
One should not necessarily expect the same toxin to create the same viral load in all individuals. In reality, it would be highly unpredictable. Even so, it may cause cells to begin to produce similar solvents among those who receive the toxin. So yes, you may observe many people who are exposed to a toxin will develop similar strains of a virus if you take millions of people into account. This is observed in those who receive vaccines. But that is also not the entire case, since vaccines can elicit many other outcomes—not just the disease it is purporting to prevent.
Thanks for the reply, Jeff. I will probably have more questions as I educate myself further on these topics and really appreciate that you take the time to respond to your readers.
You need raw milk, especially fermented milk, like raw kefir, which will feed the gut trillions of naturally occurring raw bacteria. You need raw meats, and raw eggs incorporated into the diet. And the diet must be followed for a period of years and thereon for the rest of one's life.
thank you Jeff. but what about the strongest "No-No's"? What are they? Vaccines, plastic
bottles, processed meat? Something else?
Thank you in advance.
Plastic bottles are doable if they are kept cool and are BPA free.
Glass is always best but is not always available. Tap water is far worse than any plastic bottled water. Keep that in mind.
Only buy unprocessed raw meats, and if you cook them, do not burn them or you will produce acrylamides. If you must fry, use butter or lard. These are stable animal fats with high heat points, except butter will burn if too highly heated. Peanut oil is also a good oil for cooking.
Raw animal fats are always preferable and should be incorporated into the diet.
I advocate for the consumption of raw meat, raw eggs and raw milk. Even if a person eats all cooked meats, incorporating such raw foods into their diet will help the body.
Thank you very much Jeff.
one more question if you don't mind...what's your opinion on NAC (acetylcysteine) ? A legit detox agent? Do you have any favourite detox foods or supplements?
Thank you.