Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Marty Chuzzle's avatar

Tom Cowan's 10/2/24 webinar dismisses bacteriophages as "anti-scientific rubbish". He starts with a paper from 1923 where scientists are speculating on the nature of bacteriophages. Based on this Cowan claims the particles are most likely just bacterial breakdown products. He then brings up the paper "Improvements in the production of purified M13 bacteriophage bio‑nanoparticle". The first sentence is "M13 bacteriophage is a well‑established versatile nano‑building block, which can be employed to produce novel self‑assembled functional materials and devices." Cowan condemns the paper for not demonstrating they don't get the same material from simple breakdown of the bacteria. Obviously since they are using "well-established" protocols they are not going to prove everything again just to satisfy doubters like Cowan. Reference 35 in the paper links to a detailed protocol for production of the bacteriophages.

Jamie Andrews was recently interviewed by Eric Coppolino. Unlike most interviewers Eric asked Jamie some questions he had a difficult time answering. I don't think Jamie wants the interview to be widely viewed, so he mentioned it in a Note on his Substack instead of posting it prominently on the front page.

Expand full comment
ted kicks's avatar

Collateral Damage :the No Virus gang have waged war on the truth .Their relentless distortion of reality has lead many away from following a path to where they might have learned more of the true nature of disease and its multifaceted cause. That , in itself, is an evil .

Expand full comment
24 more comments...

No posts