Jeff, Essential that you remain resolute in your mission to expose the truth over this basic issue ; it could prove fundamental in helping to ensure that there may be a return to sanity in the world regarding perhaps , all matters scientific ?
I believe an iconoclastic approach to contempoary virology will act as the hinge that shall open the door onto a new landscape ,one wherein mens`minds can be free to experience reason and rationality and throw off this suffocating cant and humbug darkening all of true science today and what little remains of the scientific method
Thanks for the comment, Ted. I think it is necessary to challenge much of current science but have a balanced mind. All of science is not tainted by deception. However, the medical sciences are probably the most manipulated there is. Perhaps some of that is human error and miscalculation. Yet, to then take that truism and default to a position of "it's all fake", does no one any good and further propagates one of the deceivers' ultimate goals, which is to confuse. Radical swings in the opposite direction are just as harmful, in most cases.
It has been my observations that many take such a stance because they do not want to do the complex work of determining the truth through the required years of exhaustive learning and meditating on the truth.
Of course, one does indeed have to temper one`s view of the nature and characteristics of a particular science and its application ( e.g. contemporary developments in the biological sciences ) with a degree of personal ,informed understanding .
I should agree wholeheartedly that that in turn demands firstly, a period of objective learning and research , (if the capacity to comprehend the complexity of the subject is there).
I think you may agree that modern communication technology /media provides an unprecedented facility for the immediate dissemination and promotion of ill informed and preconceived opinions (concerning the role of science) .These misconceptions provide a false premise for allowing offhand dismissal of primary factual evidence - and not only by the uneducated and or unwary :and as you indicated previously , all of which is precisely the insidious aim of the masonic cults.
I hope I`ll be forgiven if my comments might have seemed derogatory with regard to the operation of today`s science community as I should not and would not condemn all of science today.
(My brother is a PhD physicist and worked in his field for 50 years).
Hi Kevin, my writings in the journal will cover the main claims about viruses and their existence. The main individuals bringing those theories into mainstream will be addressed. The claim that the SARS-CoV-2 is not a naturally occurring virus is used to then claim that all viruses are non-existent.
Jeff, Essential that you remain resolute in your mission to expose the truth over this basic issue ; it could prove fundamental in helping to ensure that there may be a return to sanity in the world regarding perhaps , all matters scientific ?
I believe an iconoclastic approach to contempoary virology will act as the hinge that shall open the door onto a new landscape ,one wherein mens`minds can be free to experience reason and rationality and throw off this suffocating cant and humbug darkening all of true science today and what little remains of the scientific method
Thanks for the comment, Ted. I think it is necessary to challenge much of current science but have a balanced mind. All of science is not tainted by deception. However, the medical sciences are probably the most manipulated there is. Perhaps some of that is human error and miscalculation. Yet, to then take that truism and default to a position of "it's all fake", does no one any good and further propagates one of the deceivers' ultimate goals, which is to confuse. Radical swings in the opposite direction are just as harmful, in most cases.
It has been my observations that many take such a stance because they do not want to do the complex work of determining the truth through the required years of exhaustive learning and meditating on the truth.
Hi Jeff,
Of course, one does indeed have to temper one`s view of the nature and characteristics of a particular science and its application ( e.g. contemporary developments in the biological sciences ) with a degree of personal ,informed understanding .
I should agree wholeheartedly that that in turn demands firstly, a period of objective learning and research , (if the capacity to comprehend the complexity of the subject is there).
I think you may agree that modern communication technology /media provides an unprecedented facility for the immediate dissemination and promotion of ill informed and preconceived opinions (concerning the role of science) .These misconceptions provide a false premise for allowing offhand dismissal of primary factual evidence - and not only by the uneducated and or unwary :and as you indicated previously , all of which is precisely the insidious aim of the masonic cults.
I hope I`ll be forgiven if my comments might have seemed derogatory with regard to the operation of today`s science community as I should not and would not condemn all of science today.
(My brother is a PhD physicist and worked in his field for 50 years).
Hi Jeff - have you watched "The Viral Delusion"? Would love to get your thoughts on it: https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/programs/episode-one-narrated-18-no-perth-2-72011-a0209a?offset=3
Hi Kevin, my writings in the journal will cover the main claims about viruses and their existence. The main individuals bringing those theories into mainstream will be addressed. The claim that the SARS-CoV-2 is not a naturally occurring virus is used to then claim that all viruses are non-existent.
Unless you can provide actual examples of "voodoo science", then your claim is baseless.