"3. SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID: The scientific evidence shows that (a) it is more likely that SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus that infects people and often causes them to develop COVID than (b) COVID is not caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; it is caused by something else."
See, if you don't take his challenge, you are a virus denier as well.
He is claiming that SARS-COV-2 exists, and is the cause of COVID-19 disease.
You are claiming that the virus does NOT claim the disease.
Phagocytosis is a fundamental process for the ingestion and elimination of microbial pathogens and apoptotic cells (apoptotic cells are dying cells, which happens all the time.).
Thanks for the comment. I have indeed answered these questions before in great detail because they are vitally important to explain properly when confronting disease. You can find that information in my newsletters and articles on my website https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/. In fact, the topics you mention are the first areas I began my research in years ago. The existence of symptoms necessitates the need to logically explain their manifestation.
Throughout my life, I have observed the cyclical nature of the body. I have found that the body is biochemically affected by fluctuations in climactic conditions. Heat and humidity cause certain bacteria to become active. So too, cold temperatures beget the appearance of certain bacteria as well. Certain bacteria grow in hot and cold environments, respectively. Increases in bacterial presence result in the consumption of dead and dying tissue. This gives rise to the need to remove their breakdown waste from the body through symptoms, which are the routes of the expulsion of waste matter.
When a body contains high sedimentation of toxins, those toxins must eventually be expelled from the body, which first requires their breakdown via cells, bacteria, parasites, fungi, and lastly, when substances are too toxic for these living agents, by virus. During the final resolution phase, fever halts, or lowers, the replication of bacteria and virus.
I also found that emotional changes, usually stressors, cause disruptions in the bodily system. Those changes can cause the immediate dumping of toxins by cells into the bowels. Depression can cause tightness in the chest and back due to tightness in the muscles from stress. This can cause dryness in the chest because the body uses a great amount of nutrients to try to relax the muscles there. During the final stages of a long detoxification, a person may not have enough nutrients to formulate mucus. As such, they develop illnesses like pneumonia. As such, there will not be adequate nutrients to form mucus to lubricate the chest and bind with toxins and debris from the air. Viruses may then be produced by lung cells to cleanse and help dissolve by drawing fluid through inflammation to the area of concern, thus diluting toxicity.
Viruses are not parasites because they are not alive. They cannot be killed in the sense that a bacterium can be, which is why antibiotics do not work on them. What drugs like ivermectin do is suppress the cell itself from replicating viruses in order to detoxify. When you poison the body during detoxification, the body must halt all cleansing to shift focus to the newest insult. This shift is temporary, and the detoxification will reappear even stronger than before at a later date—in the same area, or in close proximity.
Viruses occurring in culture are indeed real. Toxins and tissues placed in the presence of a living cell outside the microbiome will analyze that tissue as foreign debris to the cell and begin to formulate solvents of a similar nature as that tissue to begin to dissolve it. Viruses work on an RNA lock-and-key system with other cells and tissues.
Solvents are all a cell has when absent from the microbiome. The unhealthiest cells in culture will begin to be dissolved by their own solvents. Thus, researchers believe this indicates infectiousness. But they are only partly correct. Viruses dissolve whole toxic cells in culture, as they do in the body. Incomplete defective viruses that are vesicles transport cellular fluids, like RNA, to help facilitate the creation of viruses in cells that do not contain the necessary amount of parts to synthesize high levels of viruses.
In the body, all is regulated in the microbiome and the virome. This is why viruses rarely happen in a robust cellular environment devoid of disease. Such illness occurs in those that are immunosuppressed. The actions that viruses appear to take in culture do not exactly mimic that which occurs in a regulated body replete with a complex microbiome and cellular environment. Thus, researchers make false conclusions about the actual actions such entities take. The argument that the virus does not exist is no different than claiming bacteria do not exist because they have erroneously been shown to be 'pathogenic'.
Bitfarmer, I am thinking about your third paragraph... It is not usual for people to experience colds/flus during the summer time but not entirely impossible either depending on one’s own level of toxin buildup or exposure to air pollution/smoke from fires, etc. I would put forth that due to the coronavirus vaccine campaign that is ongoing, more bodies are to rid themselves of the toxins from this jab at this time of the year and beyond!
Working in laboratory medicine for many years, I would agree that the PCR test method was abused early on to increase the number of (false) positives, political (which I am not going to get into), yet if done properly, PCR is still a valuable tool in aiding in the diagnosis if done within the context of the symptoms/history the patient is presenting with.
Yes, I have read of that whooping cough fiasco too. In and of itself, the PCR is not to used alone for diagnosis, such as I witnessed daily hundreds standing in lines under the tent/parking lots, etc. just to get swabbed to see if they had “it”. Right. On top of it, the test will not tell you if the RNA snippets are ‘live’ or dead, (does not detect whole virus either). I found it really strange and sad that Kary Mullis just happen to die right before the scamdemic...could have been so different, ugh.
Jeff doesn't realize, but he is a 'virus denier' himself.
His definition of a virus is NOT the same one that is accepted by mainstream virology.
His definition does not match that of a pathogenic, transmissible entity which 'flies' from person to person and cause disease.
Steve Kirsch has a challenge for all virus deniers - such as yourself, if you can prove him wrong, you can earn some good money.
Particularly, challenge no 3 here:
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/1m-bet-rules
"3. SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID: The scientific evidence shows that (a) it is more likely that SARS-CoV-2 is a novel virus that infects people and often causes them to develop COVID than (b) COVID is not caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; it is caused by something else."
See, if you don't take his challenge, you are a virus denier as well.
He is claiming that SARS-COV-2 exists, and is the cause of COVID-19 disease.
You are claiming that the virus does NOT claim the disease.
Are you up for the challenge, Jeff?
A million dollar is waiting for you.
It's not trolling.. Jeff has been ranting against 'virus deniers ' while being one himself.
If he really believes viruses do not cause disease (which I do as well), he should take Steve's challenge.
I think it would do the world a great of good, if he can prove Steve's wrong.
And I'd love to help Jeff in his challenge, if he agrees.
Can you please explain phagocytosis?
The scientific definition is:
Phagocytosis is a fundamental process for the ingestion and elimination of microbial pathogens and apoptotic cells (apoptotic cells are dying cells, which happens all the time.).
Thanks Jeff! You’re the best.
Thanks for the comment. I have indeed answered these questions before in great detail because they are vitally important to explain properly when confronting disease. You can find that information in my newsletters and articles on my website https://virusesarenotcontagious.com/. In fact, the topics you mention are the first areas I began my research in years ago. The existence of symptoms necessitates the need to logically explain their manifestation.
Throughout my life, I have observed the cyclical nature of the body. I have found that the body is biochemically affected by fluctuations in climactic conditions. Heat and humidity cause certain bacteria to become active. So too, cold temperatures beget the appearance of certain bacteria as well. Certain bacteria grow in hot and cold environments, respectively. Increases in bacterial presence result in the consumption of dead and dying tissue. This gives rise to the need to remove their breakdown waste from the body through symptoms, which are the routes of the expulsion of waste matter.
When a body contains high sedimentation of toxins, those toxins must eventually be expelled from the body, which first requires their breakdown via cells, bacteria, parasites, fungi, and lastly, when substances are too toxic for these living agents, by virus. During the final resolution phase, fever halts, or lowers, the replication of bacteria and virus.
I also found that emotional changes, usually stressors, cause disruptions in the bodily system. Those changes can cause the immediate dumping of toxins by cells into the bowels. Depression can cause tightness in the chest and back due to tightness in the muscles from stress. This can cause dryness in the chest because the body uses a great amount of nutrients to try to relax the muscles there. During the final stages of a long detoxification, a person may not have enough nutrients to formulate mucus. As such, they develop illnesses like pneumonia. As such, there will not be adequate nutrients to form mucus to lubricate the chest and bind with toxins and debris from the air. Viruses may then be produced by lung cells to cleanse and help dissolve by drawing fluid through inflammation to the area of concern, thus diluting toxicity.
Viruses are not parasites because they are not alive. They cannot be killed in the sense that a bacterium can be, which is why antibiotics do not work on them. What drugs like ivermectin do is suppress the cell itself from replicating viruses in order to detoxify. When you poison the body during detoxification, the body must halt all cleansing to shift focus to the newest insult. This shift is temporary, and the detoxification will reappear even stronger than before at a later date—in the same area, or in close proximity.
Viruses occurring in culture are indeed real. Toxins and tissues placed in the presence of a living cell outside the microbiome will analyze that tissue as foreign debris to the cell and begin to formulate solvents of a similar nature as that tissue to begin to dissolve it. Viruses work on an RNA lock-and-key system with other cells and tissues.
Solvents are all a cell has when absent from the microbiome. The unhealthiest cells in culture will begin to be dissolved by their own solvents. Thus, researchers believe this indicates infectiousness. But they are only partly correct. Viruses dissolve whole toxic cells in culture, as they do in the body. Incomplete defective viruses that are vesicles transport cellular fluids, like RNA, to help facilitate the creation of viruses in cells that do not contain the necessary amount of parts to synthesize high levels of viruses.
In the body, all is regulated in the microbiome and the virome. This is why viruses rarely happen in a robust cellular environment devoid of disease. Such illness occurs in those that are immunosuppressed. The actions that viruses appear to take in culture do not exactly mimic that which occurs in a regulated body replete with a complex microbiome and cellular environment. Thus, researchers make false conclusions about the actual actions such entities take. The argument that the virus does not exist is no different than claiming bacteria do not exist because they have erroneously been shown to be 'pathogenic'.
Bitfarmer, I am thinking about your third paragraph... It is not usual for people to experience colds/flus during the summer time but not entirely impossible either depending on one’s own level of toxin buildup or exposure to air pollution/smoke from fires, etc. I would put forth that due to the coronavirus vaccine campaign that is ongoing, more bodies are to rid themselves of the toxins from this jab at this time of the year and beyond!
Working in laboratory medicine for many years, I would agree that the PCR test method was abused early on to increase the number of (false) positives, political (which I am not going to get into), yet if done properly, PCR is still a valuable tool in aiding in the diagnosis if done within the context of the symptoms/history the patient is presenting with.
..trying to rid themselves. (Oops)
Yes, I have read of that whooping cough fiasco too. In and of itself, the PCR is not to used alone for diagnosis, such as I witnessed daily hundreds standing in lines under the tent/parking lots, etc. just to get swabbed to see if they had “it”. Right. On top of it, the test will not tell you if the RNA snippets are ‘live’ or dead, (does not detect whole virus either). I found it really strange and sad that Kary Mullis just happen to die right before the scamdemic...could have been so different, ugh.
RNA pieces in the patient sample.