I recently came across a discussion on a local city's Reddit forum. Someone shared that a business owner had posted on their Facebook page claiming that mRNA vaccines are ineffective and more dangerous than the virus they purport to prevent. The overwhelming majority of responses disagreed with the business owner's post, viciously attacking them merely for questioning the safety of mRNA vaccines. The post by the business owner referenced the Epoch Times, a source known for its lack of reliability.
I have a question for you. Have you heard of Valley Fever? It affects humans but I have only heard of dogs getting it. It supposedly infects dogs by breathing in a fungus that is in the soil. I was thinking that dogs get it not because of inhaling it but because the body is using the fungus to cleanse the lungs. I find it quite a coincidence that my parents dog 'got it' after he got his rabies vaccine and I believe he got two other vaccines that I am not sure of the name. Maybe this is something similar to TB. Not sure but it feels like a detoxification to me. What are your thoughts? Thank you.
With this marxist term (you inject into the article) 'evolution' is it natural or is it synthetic man made fallacy? You used it to finalize your statements near the last paragraph as if it's part of God's natural creation. Adaptation is different than this fallacy invention evolution. Can you conjour any evidence of the rat bat to support the evolution fraud? Maybe you were ignorant to using such a term but it tainted your whole article by using it.
"Lastly, it is crucial that when presenting our arguments, we substantiate them with scientific facts and logical reasoning, leaving no room for legitimate refutation—our arguments must be ironclad."
Is there room here for a viewpoint which will never be proved (mine), namely, that the universe/world/God (call it as you wish) has no desire to make people sick or kill them. That there is no randomness in Creation. That this is a rational world. That God lets us get sick for a reason.
Science and its viruses, microscopes, studies, etc. are only the little details. It is too bad that science fixates on these. Both sides can get as rigorous as they wish: when you want to continue believing something, the reasons for doing so are, and will forever be, endless.
I have a question for you. Have you heard of Valley Fever? It affects humans but I have only heard of dogs getting it. It supposedly infects dogs by breathing in a fungus that is in the soil. I was thinking that dogs get it not because of inhaling it but because the body is using the fungus to cleanse the lungs. I find it quite a coincidence that my parents dog 'got it' after he got his rabies vaccine and I believe he got two other vaccines that I am not sure of the name. Maybe this is something similar to TB. Not sure but it feels like a detoxification to me. What are your thoughts? Thank you.
With this marxist term (you inject into the article) 'evolution' is it natural or is it synthetic man made fallacy? You used it to finalize your statements near the last paragraph as if it's part of God's natural creation. Adaptation is different than this fallacy invention evolution. Can you conjour any evidence of the rat bat to support the evolution fraud? Maybe you were ignorant to using such a term but it tainted your whole article by using it.
"Lastly, it is crucial that when presenting our arguments, we substantiate them with scientific facts and logical reasoning, leaving no room for legitimate refutation—our arguments must be ironclad."
Is there room here for a viewpoint which will never be proved (mine), namely, that the universe/world/God (call it as you wish) has no desire to make people sick or kill them. That there is no randomness in Creation. That this is a rational world. That God lets us get sick for a reason.
Science and its viruses, microscopes, studies, etc. are only the little details. It is too bad that science fixates on these. Both sides can get as rigorous as they wish: when you want to continue believing something, the reasons for doing so are, and will forever be, endless.