1 Comment

Don't you think that language is extremely important when describing new theories? And that when we borrow the same terminology from the old order and carry it forward to the new order it can create the opposite effect?

In other words, using terms such as: "viral infection" and "Antibodies are proteins that bind to and neutralize the virus", - rather than help elucidates your stance that viruses aren't causative agents for disease, but a byproduct of intrinsic cellular mechanism to maintain homeostasis - inadvertently cements the reductionist approach (the Germ Theory) that strives to separate bodily functions and order them into "good" and "bad", in which viruses are deemed to be linear causative agents for dis-ease, which, clearly by their composition, being non-sentient and non-living, there is no such thing.

Have you pondered about that?

Expand full comment