‘Issuing a state of emergency is fearmongering that leads to distrust in nature and those around us.‘
——seems to be an ever ongoing theme to instill fear and distrust of nature and our own nature in order to have control over our health decisions and our pocketbook$
Always put the blame on a virus! So easy! No real thought or solutions put forth, such as for the overcrowding and unhealthy conditions, let’s just cull millions and make humans hurt for it.
——Typical playbook that we all should be on to by now!!!
Can you expand on this by chance:
‘Furthermore, even when viruses are detected in animal populations, they are often of the sort that cannot thrive in humans due to differences in biology and physiology.’
——i know I am getting back to molecular mismatching, but it seems logical that since humans, all animals for that matter too, are going to differ in their innate RNA/DNA that they would naturally be incompatible with each other/cross species! Therefore their viruses as well! ❤️
Yes, DNA and RNA differences serve as a natural barrier that prevents most animal viruses from infecting humans. These molecular blueprints, unique to each species, act like a lock-and-key system, ensuring that a virus designed for one organism's cells doesn’t easily adapt to another. However, nature isn’t foolproof. There’s always a slim chance that a virus could undergo mutations, altering its receptor proteins enzymatically to match those found on human cells.
The enzymatic action of viral replication doesn't "intend" to mutate receptor proteins but provides the groundwork for such mutations to arise and potentially become advantageous for the virus in a new host. Such a match would allow the virus to enter into and infect human cells, but this kind of molecular leap is rare, and when it does happen, it’s often the result of prolonged exposure in very strict settings (lab settings).
‘…And when the vaccine data shows they’re efficacious and a benefit to the American public, he will promote them. . .’ —-Robert Redfield now says of RFK JR, covering his butt in my mind. Is it even possible to make vaccines of benefit? I can’t think so..
The only thing that comes to mind is oncolytic treatments that use viruses, though these aren't traditional vaccines. I'm uncertain whether vaccines could ever be beneficial, at least when it comes to viruses. Ultimately, they mask the problem rather than address the underlying issue. 'Natural immunity' (a misunderstood term in a way) will always be far superior because it's a natural symbiosis with nature where the body picks and chooses what it needs at any given time.
To the best of my knowledge, Congress tasked big pharma over 30 years ago (with the 1986 Act) of showing them yearly quality control, which they have never done. Simply comparing one iteration of a vaccine to another is not quality control.
And I simply can’t believe that injecting into humans, entirely unnatural, chemical adjuvants + animal/fetal tissue, over and over and over again (where are we now?!72+ for the childhood schedule, not to mention an adult schedule too $$$), can ever show benefit, only long term harm and more folks kept as lab rats in the cartel$ of big pharma/big medicine… 😔
I always point to my own experiences when answering such questions, even though many might dismiss them as irrelevant because most people seem to rely solely on textbook knowledge rather than real-world experience. For me, however, these experiences are undeniable facts. The reality that I haven’t been vaccinated since childhood—roughly 25 years ago—stands as a witness and testament to the nonnecessity of vaccination.
‘Issuing a state of emergency is fearmongering that leads to distrust in nature and those around us.‘
——seems to be an ever ongoing theme to instill fear and distrust of nature and our own nature in order to have control over our health decisions and our pocketbook$
Always put the blame on a virus! So easy! No real thought or solutions put forth, such as for the overcrowding and unhealthy conditions, let’s just cull millions and make humans hurt for it.
——Typical playbook that we all should be on to by now!!!
Can you expand on this by chance:
‘Furthermore, even when viruses are detected in animal populations, they are often of the sort that cannot thrive in humans due to differences in biology and physiology.’
——i know I am getting back to molecular mismatching, but it seems logical that since humans, all animals for that matter too, are going to differ in their innate RNA/DNA that they would naturally be incompatible with each other/cross species! Therefore their viruses as well! ❤️
Yes, DNA and RNA differences serve as a natural barrier that prevents most animal viruses from infecting humans. These molecular blueprints, unique to each species, act like a lock-and-key system, ensuring that a virus designed for one organism's cells doesn’t easily adapt to another. However, nature isn’t foolproof. There’s always a slim chance that a virus could undergo mutations, altering its receptor proteins enzymatically to match those found on human cells.
The enzymatic action of viral replication doesn't "intend" to mutate receptor proteins but provides the groundwork for such mutations to arise and potentially become advantageous for the virus in a new host. Such a match would allow the virus to enter into and infect human cells, but this kind of molecular leap is rare, and when it does happen, it’s often the result of prolonged exposure in very strict settings (lab settings).
‘…And when the vaccine data shows they’re efficacious and a benefit to the American public, he will promote them. . .’ —-Robert Redfield now says of RFK JR, covering his butt in my mind. Is it even possible to make vaccines of benefit? I can’t think so..
The only thing that comes to mind is oncolytic treatments that use viruses, though these aren't traditional vaccines. I'm uncertain whether vaccines could ever be beneficial, at least when it comes to viruses. Ultimately, they mask the problem rather than address the underlying issue. 'Natural immunity' (a misunderstood term in a way) will always be far superior because it's a natural symbiosis with nature where the body picks and chooses what it needs at any given time.
To the best of my knowledge, Congress tasked big pharma over 30 years ago (with the 1986 Act) of showing them yearly quality control, which they have never done. Simply comparing one iteration of a vaccine to another is not quality control.
And I simply can’t believe that injecting into humans, entirely unnatural, chemical adjuvants + animal/fetal tissue, over and over and over again (where are we now?!72+ for the childhood schedule, not to mention an adult schedule too $$$), can ever show benefit, only long term harm and more folks kept as lab rats in the cartel$ of big pharma/big medicine… 😔
I always point to my own experiences when answering such questions, even though many might dismiss them as irrelevant because most people seem to rely solely on textbook knowledge rather than real-world experience. For me, however, these experiences are undeniable facts. The reality that I haven’t been vaccinated since childhood—roughly 25 years ago—stands as a witness and testament to the nonnecessity of vaccination.