Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mia Breeze's avatar

How did they know what the virus particles they were looking for looked like, if the virus in question and it's particles hadnt been isolated first? How were they able to identify and distinguish the virus particle from all the other particles in the sample if they had never seen it before? How do they know those particles are actually "virus" particles? Did they just choose the funniest looking particle among all the others present and decide that was it? On what basis were these particles chosen? Are you aware of how many different types of particles appear in a stool sample? Do you really not understand why isolation necessarily has to take place first before you can identify the "virus" in other ways?

Did they do a control and make sure those particles in their pictures did not appear in feces samples of healthy humans? Did they provide pictures of their controls?

Re the isolation and purification of plant viruses see https://odysee.com/@niodagar:b/TMV:0

The fact that you think what you have set out refutes to any degree what the no-virus movement has been demonstrating shows how very very little you understand in this debate.

Expand full comment
ted kicks's avatar

Congratulations on your excellent expose’ of the truth but should we to suspect that the main protagonists are disingenuous as to this factual evidence ; keeping others in ignorance be the primary objective ?

Expand full comment
65 more comments...

No posts