Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ted kicks's avatar

A response of considerable magnitude and clarity (if you`ll excuse the pun). You have illustrated a simple necessity viz.: that we must first check thoroughly that we are not just making assertions but that there exists unequivocal , factual evidence that supports a proclaimed truth for without this principle, we will leave reason in darkness.

Expand full comment
gruppler's avatar

When I first began exploring your work, your mention of the Rife microscope was the first I'd heard of it. I was excited by the idea, so I tried to learn what I could about how it worked. This exploration led me to the same conclusions you patiently explained here. It's impossible to get around the limit of the wavelength of visible light without using something besides visible light (that provides greater resolution without being destructive). I had pondered how polarization might possibly offer a way around this inconvenient obstacle, but that is beyond me. I'd like to think Rife had really discovered something to this effect, but the evidence paints a less fantastic picture. However, I'd much rather settle for a disappointing truth than commit to believing an exciting lie.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts