Latest Claim: Nanobots in Vaccines?

A continuation of an older claim

This is what Alex Jones recently posted to his website:

"Josh Sigurdson reports on a study out of South Korea and Japan proving what people like David Icke has been saying for years. The covid injections contain self replicating nanobots that are entirely inorganic. A new study called "Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study" shows that under a microscope both wet and dry, Pfizer and Moderna injections contain materials that begin in one dimensional and then morph into three dimensional technology that grows, turns tubular, spiral, circular and attacks the cells of the body. Much of these materials are clearly robotic technology with magnetic capabilities.
Some of this technology somehow appears and disappears over time. This is something many of us have warned about for years and were called crazy for, yet the evidence continues to pile up. As we reported recently, a new self-assembling version of mRNA is being developed in Japan called "saRNA" which literally means "self assembling RNA." It is set to be put into injections worldwide and have the capability to become its own bodily vaccine "factory." Not only can this technology lead to clots and severe health problems as it attacks the cells of the body, but it can also be remotely controlled in many cases, something David Icke has commented on for years including in 2020 when he was banned for bringing up the 5G correlation."

The study originates from two individuals: Young Mi Lee, MD, an obstetrician and gynecologist in South Korea, and Daniel Broudy, PhD, a professor of applied linguistics in Japan. This raises several red flags regarding the scientific credibility of any research in the so-called study.

The abstract of the study begins by stating:

Already, this study begins with highly biased language.

The images provided in the study raise doubts about the validity of the claims being made.

1. Common Phenomena Misinterpreted?: The appearance of "rouleaux" (stacking of red blood cells) is not unique to vaccines and can happen under various physiological conditions, including dehydration, infections, or inflammatory responses. It’s a naturally occurring phenomenon that can be seen under many circumstances unrelated to vaccination. The images alone do not prove causality between vaccines and these cell structures.

2. Vaccine Administration and Blood Contact: Vaccines are administered intramuscularly, not directly into the bloodstream. For the images to have any meaningful relevance, they would need to demonstrate how these vaccines could cause such effects through normal biological pathways after injection.

3. Lack of In Vivo Relevance: The experimental setup involves placing a micro-drop of vaccine fluid directly in contact with blood or plasma on a glass slide, which is not representative of how vaccines interact with cells within the human body. Vaccines are injected into muscle tissue, where they are processed by immune cells, rather than coming into direct contact with blood in the manner described. This introduces a flawed premise in terms of biological relevance.
   However, the study does state:
   “There is an important limitation on the foregoing results with live cells. Our design involves a kind of in vitro laboratory exposure, or incubation. Such exposures are only remotely comparable to fluids introduced in vivo to living human beings by injecting them into muscle tissue. Blood cells and sperm cells may be impacted by progressive fluid transport over minutes and hours depending on the relative efficiency of the cardiovascular and lymphoid systems of the individual. Transport can be expected to be superior in younger and healthier persons —potentially making them more, not less, susceptible than older persons with less efficient fluid transport systems —to the sort of cellular damage our results demonstrate to be occurring in vitro.”

4. Potential for Misrepresentation of Data: Without peer-reviewed backing, these types of visual findings can be misleading. The images do not clearly correlate with actual side effects observed in the billions of vaccine recipients worldwide, where adverse effects have been closely monitored and documented through extensive reporting systems.

A following claim from the study states:

Rouleaux Formation:

• While rouleaux formation (where red blood cells stack together like coins) can occur in response to various factors, including inflammation or changes in plasma proteins, it is not specific to vaccine interactions. The study suggests that rouleaux formation leads to blood flow stasis and hypoxemia (fatigue), but these are complex processes influenced by many factors beyond what is presented in these experiments.

This claim was also made in the study:

The term “chip-like assembly” appears throughout the study and seems to me to be designed to prompt readers to associate these images with computer chips self-assembling. However, what you are actually seeing are simply crystallization patterns of various substances as observed under a microscope. To illustrate this, refer to the picture below, which shows salt crystallizations that closely resemble the top row of images from the previous example.

Salt crystal formations

The remaining images can be similarly explained and do not warrant extensive analysis. They simply represent formations resulting from the breakdown of various fluids, proteins, and other organic substances.

---

The study goes on to claim the following:

The study concludes, in part:

---

Conclusion:

I could delve further into this ‘study’, as it goes on for considerable length, but it would be a futile endeavor. The primary point I am making is in questioning the methodology and the erroneous conclusions drawn, which ultimately undermine the study’s validity. It is almost unbelievable that purported professionals from Korea are producing extensive diatribes suggesting that these ordinary structures are ‘self-assembling’ nanobots. Such claims are not only absurd but also ridiculous.

Consider this: Do these structures exhibit any characteristics of intelligent design or functionality akin to a computer chip? Clearly not. These are merely artifacts from the breakdown of various substances under microscopy, highly misrepresented as something they are not.
Also consider: Do the claims of self-assembly align with our current understanding of human biology and the numerous conditions that would need to perfectly align in the entire populace, in every body, to reliably sustain such a nefarious ‘self-assembly’ process through the use of boosters?
Lastly, consider the nearly 400 days of testing these samples. Such an extended period provides more than enough time for various formations to develop. Despite this, radical conclusions are drawn from patterns that any high school science student could easily recognize as non-unique. Making the absurd leap that these normal structures are “chip assemblies,” based on little to nothing else, is anti-scientific.

Why do individuals in fringe conspiracy groups persist in promoting such extreme and irresponsible theories? Those lacking a strong background in biochemistry or biology might easily be deceived into taking such so-called studies seriously, as they may not fully grasp the nature of the structures or recognize the misleading language employed.

The question arises: Why would such a study go so deep to prove their erroneous claims? Perhaps as an attempt to gain attention within a waiting conspiracy community filled with millions who are waiting for the next ‘theory’ with bated breath?

Jeff Green