Is Bird Flu the New COVID?
The current discourse surrounding the transmission of bird flu raises several critical questions that require careful examination. The narrative put forth by various sources suggests that the flu has spread among chickens, but there are several inconsistencies in the reasoning that warrant closer scrutiny. One major point of contention lies in the claim that there is no human-to-human transmission of the virus, yet the fundamental question remains: how did the chickens contract the flu if they are all confined to the same farm? This poses a logical dilemma—if chickens do not have the ability to travel independently, where did the initial carrier chicken come from, and how did it introduce the virus to the others? The argument that the virus must have come from some external source, given the lack of human involvement, leads to an even more profound question: where did the virus originate in the wild, and how did it manage to jump to the chicken population?
Moreover, this situation becomes even more perplexing when considering the reported spread of the virus across multiple states. There have been over 60 confirmed cases in humans, each originating from different states. This raises an additional concern: did the virus somehow cross state lines? For the virus to be transmitted to humans in such a widespread manner, it seems that it indeed would have had to travel across significant geographical distances. The question then becomes how the virus was able to travel so extensively, as viruses seem to do. I have written extensively about this, and call it the illusion of viral transmission, which is a complex set of variables that align in such a way as to cause the manifestation of viruses in susceptible and degenerative cells in animals.
To further complicate matters, most chickens are raised on farms and rarely leave these enclosed environments unless they are sent to slaughter. This suggests that the chickens themselves would not have been exposed to any external sources of the virus on a regular basis from outside chickens. Therefore, if humans were not the vector for the transmission of the virus to the chickens, we are left to wonder how the virus was ‘introduced’ to this isolated group.
This line of questioning is not just academic but also has practical implications. The concern is not only about the so-called transmission of the virus among chickens but also about the potential economic impact, particularly on the poultry industry. Should the virus continue to affect the chicken population, there is a real possibility that the price of chicken products could increase significantly, impacting both producers and consumers alike.
Could this all be by design? If so, why? Could the reason lie in a continuation of medical tyranny we may see continue to unfold in 2025 and beyond?
The Real Culprits of Animal Flu
The current discourse surrounding the bird flu virus and its purported spread raises significant questions when viewed through the lens of industrial pollution and the biological accumulation of toxins within organisms, such as chickens. Instead of framing the situation as a contagious outbreak, a far more plausible explanation lies in the environmental factors that contribute to the buildup of pollutants in the bodies of these animals. Industrial pollution, which often includes heavy metals, chemicals, and other toxic substances, can accumulate biologically over time, disrupting the health of organisms exposed to these pollutants. This accumulation can lead to weakened immune systems, making animals more susceptible to various diseases, including bird flu.
The key issue here is the lack of clear evidence supporting the claim that bird flu is spreading from chicken to chicken in a contagious manner. In fact, there is no substantial proof that the virus is truly transmissible in the way that is often suggested. The idea that the flu is spreading uncontrollably across farms and states is speculative and does not align with what I know about viruses through my study of human biology and virology. Viruses require specific mechanisms to enter cells. The focus should shift to the environmental conditions under which these chickens live and the role industrial pollution plays in this context, but that will likely not transpire in any meaningful way.
Chickens, particularly those in industrial farming operations, are often confined to environments with high levels of air and water contamination. These farms are frequently located in areas where industrial pollutants such as pesticides, fertilizers, and heavy metals are prevalent. Over time, these toxins accumulate in the animals' bodies, either through ingestion, inhalation, or absorption through the skin. When humans are around these animals for long periods, they breath in the sloughed off their toxic dead skin which is breathed into the lungs of the human, thereby affecting their physiology. The physiological impact of these pollutants can weaken the chickens' immune systems, making them more vulnerable to diseases that might otherwise not affect them. This biological accumulation of industrial pollutants create an environment in which viruses like bird flu can thrive, not because they are spreading between chickens in a contagious way, but because the chickens’ bodies are more susceptible to infection due to their weakened state.
Furthermore, the claim that over 60 cases of the virus in humans have been reported in different states raises additional doubts about the notion of contagion. If the virus were truly spreading through direct contact between chickens, one would expect a more localized outbreak, with clear evidence of transmission pathways. Instead, the fact that the cases are scattered across multiple states without any obvious connection suggests that these incidents are independent, localized events rather than the result of a widespread, contagious pathogen. If one looks closely, they will see the same timeline in all viral outbreaks. The virus is not spreading at all, but rather manifesting in different areas as a result of the environmental conditions and biological vulnerabilities of the chickens in these specific locations, in relationship to the complex variables of virus manifestation I mentioned previously.
The primary concern here is not the virus itself, but the environmental factors contributing to the health crisis among poultry. Industrial pollution plays a significant role in the accumulation of toxins that affect the health of these animals, and the weakened immune systems caused by this buildup make them more susceptible to diseases. If we consider the possibility that the bird flu is not spreading in a contagious manner but instead is a symptom of broader environmental issues, we must ask: how do industrial pollutants contribute to the vulnerability of chickens to diseases? Much the same way they do in humans. But this question requires a deeper understanding of the biological and environmental interactions that create these conditions.
Again, this situation also has serious implications for public health and the economy. If the current situation is indeed a result of industrial pollution and not a contagious outbreak as I contend, the solution lies not in controlling a spreading virus but in addressing the root causes of environmental contamination. Industrial practices that lead to the contamination of agricultural environments must be scrutinized and reformed to prevent further damage to both animal and human health.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the narrative surrounding the spread of bird flu among chickens is misleading because it is viewed through the faulty, shortsighted lens of contagion, as it always has been. It leads to fear, panic, and economic turmoil, and sweeping change in law, with the potential for the erosion of individual liberty and freedom, including bodily autonomy. The evidence does not support the idea that this virus is spreading from chicken to chicken in the way it has been portrayed—it never does. Instead, the situation is always the result of environmental pollution, which accumulates biologically in the organisms exposed to it, weakening their immune systems and making them more susceptible to disease.
As always, this broader understanding I submit calls for a shift in focus, away from fears of a so-called contagious outbreak and towards addressing the industrial practices that contribute to the environmental and biological vulnerabilities of these animals. Only through this holistic approach can we begin to address the true causes of such disease and work toward a healthier, more sustainable future for both animals and humans.
—Jeff Green
So this question could be asked following both of your latest substack posts…. What do you think about states outlawing the sale of cage free eggs now, beginning 2025? 😑