Another Perspective of Disease
Why New Age "Terrain Theory" Refuses to Recognize Viruses
Another Perspective of Disease
Why New Age "Terrain Theory" Refuses to Recognize Viruses
Written by Jeff Green
Those that completely deny viruses are overly dogmatic and do not want to entertain alternative hypotheses. This is evident in how they conduct themselves in conversations.
For example, you can read Christine Massey's flippant and outright dismissive response to me here: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/response-to-jeff-green/
They claim that viral structures are non-existent and mere debris, in part, because science has claimed those structures to be pathogenic. They do not entertain even the possibility that the definition of “virus” is mostly correct, except for the pathogenic clause.
I ask: Has science not also attributed pathogenic qualities to bacteria where there are none in practice? Do bacteria exist? Ponder that for a moment.
First, they theorized that all viruses were mistaken for exosomes. I proved how this was inaccurate in mid-2020 in my lectures and writings on the subject, and did so again in July 2022 in more detail (read).
As exosome theory began to lose much of its allure, the focus turned to the constant repeating that viruses have never been isolated/purified, thereby claimed not proven to exist, and that the science of virology is a complete fraud. It appears they seemingly constructed their position to have no compromise; no ability to think outside their limited box.
It is my humble and informed view that individuals manifesting such deconstructionist attitudes are not on the side of truth. In fact, they remind me of ardent pro-vaccine supporters. True scientific minds are open to all possibilities, within reason. They do not engage as simpletons in their intellect, as is displayed by many die-hard virus deniers.
It appears they simply cannot stand what I have to say, likely because I am a threat to the agenda trying to be achieved in the pushing of these anti-science 'non-theories'. Their attempts to refute what I have said have not been successful, so they resort to lashing out.
I have remained virtually unchanged in my positions with regard to viruses and the nature of disease since early 2020. I have maintained that viruses are real, have been isolated/purified, and have been observed, characterized, and sequenced.
I have entertained all sides of the equation. I have pondered the points that those in the virus denial camp have brought forth. In the end, I concluded their position was simply not a well-posited theory (or, in this case, lack thereof), and that it relied on the blatant twisting and misunderstanding of study language and their terms, of which most of their audience would be unaware of.
Those leading the New Age "Terrain Theory" hide behind the allure of the Terrain Theory of old. Unfortunately, the original intent of the theory has been perverted, in part, to serve the agenda and business model of those who have been elevated to 'health guru' status.
Note: Do remember that Terrain Theory was posited a number of years before the discovery of viruses.
My position mirrors that of true Terrain Theory:
Disease of all types occurs from an imbalance in the cellular environment. How that transpires must be explained in scientific reasoning. In all cases of disease, toxicity begets detoxification which begets symptoms of expulsion experienced in all forms of disease. I state that viruses are chemical-like solvents created and multiplied by eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells when they and their living agents of the microbiome cannot break down non-bioactive toxins. I state that viruses have intrinsic roles in the maintenance of all living organisms and plants.
Science itself agrees with much of this. Science states viruses can be used to dissolve cancerous cells, among others. Science states, many times, that viruses are our helpers and exist in harmony with the body. Science states that viral illnesses increase with exposure to pollution and toxicity of all kinds. Science also states that poor health increases the chance of developing a viral illness.
It is only a matter of time before the definition of virus changes from being “pathogenic” to “caused from a state of disease”. That may not transpire here and now in our time, but in the distant future, it may indeed. Those such as myself will be vindicated in the annals of history.
I state that science has been correct in many of its theories, especially with regard to the documented existence of entities like bacteria and viruses. I have stated that parts of science have been used for ulterior motives that do not benefit man. Even so, I maintain that this is only a small fraction of science itself and does not represent the whole of science, or legitimate science history.
Where I mainly differ from mainstream views is on the causes of disease, and what modes the body uses to attempt to restore homeostasis. This, in my view, is many times misobserved by science.
For example, I wrote early on about the nature of the cell culture, and how cells placed under duress can elicit the production of viral proteins.
There indeed can be damage in a culture that causes cells to produce virions.
Viral tissue added to cell culture is analyzed by cells upon contact and treated as foreign debris. In culture, cells exist outside the microbiome and have no regulatory agents to cleanse. Thus, they must construct their own solvent enzymes (virus). Cells analyze the makeup (DNA/RNA) of the foreign tissue and begin to replicate their own solvents of similar nature to dissolve those tissues.
However, in culture, most cells become dissolved by their own solvents (virus) from the inability to regulate themselves. This is considered 'CPE'.
Cells minutely mutate their genomic blueprints for proteins depending upon the tissue they encounter (strains & variants).
Viruses can enter fully toxic cells in order to dissolve and dilute them from the cellular environment in order to restore cellular homeostasis (normally through viral infection).
Refusing to Recognize Viruses
Those in what I call "New Alternative Health" are mainly made up of high-level personalities garnering many tens of thousands of views. Most of them hide behind their medical schooling (mostly indoctrination) to make their audience believe they are qualified to speak on the complexities of health and nutrition without having displayed an extensive in-depth knowledge of the subject itself. Medical certificates do not give us good health, nor do they mean that a person has scientific common sense.
At this point, they have no motive whatsoever to change their position, which to any well-reasoned mind, has a poor foundation.
In the end, they will fail in their agenda. The seed of truth has already been planted by those such as myself, that indeed, there is an alternative hypothesis to strongly consider when thinking about disease, how it occurs, and the modes by which the body expresses itself in such states.
Those in the "Gang" have no legitimate theory to counter the pathogenic theories put forth by science. In order to do so, they must completely swindle what I have put forth, and what a very select few have put forth in the past, for there exists no other logical explanation for the appearance of symptoms associated with viral illness.
As such, they hardly bother to approach this vitally important topic in understanding disease. Their only effort is to briefly cover a broad list of toxins that we encounter in our environment, which any person can do without much thought. Yet, they cannot explicitly explain how those toxins damage the body, nor the many modes by which the body tries to remove them.
To do so, they must walk the path I took to knowledge. There is no shortcut. I arrived at my conclusions over many years of hard laborious contemplation on the nature of mankind, the body, and his place in nature.
This is why virus deniers must continue to deny the existence of viruses. They will not broach the topic of how disease truly transpires, and how the body expresses itself in the disease state. To do so would cause them to run head-on into the necessary existence of solvents produced in cells to dissolve non-bioactive toxins accumulated from our environment.
Regardless of their claims that they mustn’t, they must logically posit another entity that exists that can take the place of the virus. They cannot do so legitimately, for there exists no other entity as complex and as highly replicated by cells in a short timeframe that could logically come close to replacing viruses.
In closing, I would like to mention that Steve Kirsch was kind enough to include me in one of his recent articles. I am hopeful that those like Kirsch will read my writings further and be compelled by an alternative way to view so-called pathogenic entities out to attack.
Thanks for reading Jeff Green Articles/Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.